Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in San Marino
San Marino: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in San Marino, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
San Marino recorded 1 DB16-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over five years.
San Marino ranks 116th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in San Marino, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 1 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
San Marino compared with similar countries
- San Marino's 1 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for high income countries, which is 3 DB16-20 methodology, 33% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
- San Marino's 1 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 3 DB16-20 methodology, 33% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near San Marino
- 115 Pakistan 1.15 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Bangladesh 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Japan 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Afghanistan 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Bahamas 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Barbados 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Belgium 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Benin 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Burkina Faso 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Cambodia 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Ethiopia 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Ghana 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Iran 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Ireland 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Kiribati 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Kuwait 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Kyrgyzstan 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Lesotho 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Luxembourg 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Mauritania 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Micronesia (country) 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Mongolia 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Myanmar 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Niger 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Oman 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Panama 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Senegal 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Seychelles 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Sri Lanka 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Switzerland 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 East Timor 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Tonga 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Uzbekistan 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Vanuatu 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Vietnam 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 116 Zimbabwe 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for San Marino
- Exchange rate, new LCU per USD extended backward, period average 0.8597 (2026)
- Exchange rate, old LCU per USD extended forward, period average 0.8597 (2026)
- Official exchange rate, LCU per USD, period average 0.8597 (2026)
- Free country, gaps filled 2 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating, per capita 0 units per person (2025)
- Civil liberties rating, gaps filled 1 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Civil liberties rating 1 (2025)
- Free country 2 (2025)
- Consumer price index 131.91 2010 = 100 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in San Marino?
- Enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in San Marino was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in San Marino?
- The highest recorded value was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in San Marino?
- The lowest recorded value was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does San Marino rank for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
- San Marino ranks 116th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this San Marino data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.