Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Kiribati

Kiribati: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
1 DB16-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
116th
of 191 countries
All-time high
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Kiribati, 2015–2019

00.20.40.60.812015201720192015: 1 DB16-20 methodology2016: 1 DB16-20 methodology2017: 1 DB16-20 methodology2018: 1 DB16-20 methodology2019: 1 DB16-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Kiribati is 1 DB16-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

Kiribati ranks 116th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Kiribati, year by year

Year DB16-20 methodology Change
2015 1 DB16-20 methodology —
2016 1 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 1 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 1 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 1 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%

Kiribati compared with similar countries

  • Kiribati's 1 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 1 DB16-20 methodology, 1.0× the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Kiribati's 1 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 1.5 DB16-20 methodology, 67% of the median. (28 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Kiribati

  1. 115 Pakistan 1.15 DB16-20 methodology compare
  2. 116 Bangladesh 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  3. 116 Japan 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  4. 116 Afghanistan 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  5. 116 Bahamas 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  6. 116 Barbados 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  7. 116 Belgium 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  8. 116 Benin 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  9. 116 Burkina Faso 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  10. 116 Cambodia 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  11. 116 Ethiopia 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  12. 116 Ghana 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  13. 116 Iran 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  14. 116 Ireland 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  15. 116 Kuwait 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  16. 116 Kyrgyzstan 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  17. 116 Lesotho 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  18. 116 Luxembourg 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  19. 116 Mauritania 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  20. 116 Micronesia (country) 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  21. 116 Mongolia 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  22. 116 Myanmar 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  23. 116 Niger 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  24. 116 Oman 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  25. 116 Panama 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  26. 116 San Marino 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  27. 116 Senegal 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  28. 116 Seychelles 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  29. 116 Sri Lanka 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  30. 116 Switzerland 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  31. 116 East Timor 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  32. 116 Tonga 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  33. 116 Uzbekistan 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  34. 116 Vanuatu 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  35. 116 Vietnam 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
  36. 116 Zimbabwe 1 DB16-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Kiribati

All data for Kiribati →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Kiribati?
Enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Kiribati was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Kiribati?
The highest recorded value was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Kiribati?
The lowest recorded value was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Kiribati rank for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
Kiribati ranks 116th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Kiribati data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Kiribati. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-case-management-0-6-db16-20-methodology/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-case-management-0-6-db16-20-methodology/kiribati/">Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Kiribati</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.