Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Palau
Palau: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Palau, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Palau recorded 1.5 DB16-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.
Palau ranks 97th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Palau, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1.5 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 1.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Palau compared with similar countries
- Palau's 1.5 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for high income countries, which is 3 DB16-20 methodology, 50% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Palau's 1.5 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 1.5 DB16-20 methodology, 1.0× the median. (28 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Palau
- 97 India 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Albania 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Angola 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Belize 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Bolivia 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Colombia 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Cyprus 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Germany 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Guinea-Bissau 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Guyana 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Papua New Guinea 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Philippines 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Poland 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Sao Tome and Principe 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Solomon Islands 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Tanzania 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Uganda 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Palau
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Elected parliament and government, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Political opposition, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Consumer price index 160.77 2010 = 100 (2025)
- Free country 2 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating 1 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Palau?
- Enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Palau was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Palau?
- The highest recorded value was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Palau?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Palau rank for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
- Palau ranks 97th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Palau data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.