Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Angola
Angola: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Angola, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Angola recorded 1.5 DB16-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
That places Angola 97th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Angola, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1.5 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 1.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Angola compared with similar countries
- Angola's 1.5 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 1 DB16-20 methodology, 1.5× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Angola's 1.5 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 1 DB16-20 methodology, 1.5× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Angola
- 97 India 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Albania 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Belize 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Bolivia 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Colombia 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Cyprus 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Germany 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Guinea-Bissau 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Guyana 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Palau 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Papua New Guinea 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Philippines 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Poland 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Sao Tome and Principe 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Solomon Islands 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Tanzania 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 97 Uganda 1.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Angola
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4536 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.163 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 15.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 20.43 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8877 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Angola?
- Enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Angola was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Angola?
- The highest recorded value was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Angola?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Angola rank for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
- Angola ranks 97th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Angola data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.