What is enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Kosovo?

Enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Kosovo was 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.

What is the highest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Kosovo?

The highest recorded value was 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.

What is the lowest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Kosovo?

The lowest recorded value was 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.

How does Kosovo rank for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?

Kosovo ranks 1st out of 1 groups with data for 2019.

Where does this Kosovo data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Kosovo

Name: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Kosovo
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Kosovo: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) was 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

2.5 DB16-20 methodology

Change on year

unchanged

Rank

1st

of 1 groups

All-time high

2.5 DB16-20 methodology

in 2015

All-time low

2.5 DB16-20 methodology

in 2015

Years of data

2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Kosovo, 2015–2019

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

Kosovo recorded 2.5 DB16-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over five years.

Countries ranked near Kosovo

1 China 5.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
1 Australia 5.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
1 Latvia 5.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
4 Greece 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
4 Kazakhstan 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
4 Namibia 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
4 Portugal 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
4 Rwanda 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
4 Turkey 5 DB16-20 methodology compare
4 United Kingdom 5 DB16-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Kosovo

Rule of Law - Governance score 57.86 0-100 (2024)
Rule of Law - Governance estimate 0.0521 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
Voice and Accountability - Governance score 59.64 0-100 (2024)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate 0.1596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
Political Stability - Governance score 60.4 0-100 (2024)
Political Stability - Governance estimate -0.3219 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
Control of Corruption - Governance score 42.7 0-100 (2024)
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate -0.2547 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate -0.2229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
Regulatory Quality - Governance score 51.35 0-100 (2024)

All data for Kosovo →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Kosovo?: Enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Kosovo was 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Kosovo?: The highest recorded value was 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Kosovo?: The lowest recorded value was 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Kosovo rank for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?: Kosovo ranks 1st out of 1 groups with data for 2019.
Where does this Kosovo data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit: DB16-20 methodology
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.