Kosovo vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6)
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) over time
- Kosovo
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports 2.5 DB16-20 methodology against 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has been ahead every year.
Kosovo ranks 64th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 64th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: case management (0-6), Kosovo or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Kosovo, at 2.5 DB16-20 methodology against 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) between Kosovo and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
- Kosovo ranks 64th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 64th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.