Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop in Belarus
Belarus: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop was 0 units per square kilometre in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop in Belarus, 1992–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 0 units per square kilometre for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop in 2019.
The figure is up 6.7% on the previous year and up 46.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop in Belarus peaked at 0 units per square kilometre in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1994.
That places Belarus 83rd out of 184 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop in Belarus, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0 units per square kilometre | +19.9% |
| 1994 | 0 units per square kilometre | -26.6% |
| 1995 | 0 units per square kilometre | +69.6% |
| 1996 | 0 units per square kilometre | +54.7% |
| 1997 | 0 units per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 1998 | 0 units per square kilometre | +23.5% |
| 1999 | 0 units per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 2000 | 0 units per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 2001 | 0 units per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 2002 | 0 units per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 2003 | 0 units per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 2004 | 0 units per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2005 | 0 units per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 2006 | 0 units per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2007 | 0 units per square kilometre | +44.9% |
| 2008 | 0 units per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 2009 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2010 | 0 units per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 2011 | 0 units per square kilometre | +25.2% |
| 2012 | 0 units per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2013 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2014 | 0 units per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 2015 | 0 units per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 2016 | 0 units per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 2017 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2018 | 0 units per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2019 | 0 units per square kilometre | +6.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop in Belarus?
- Emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop in Belarus was 0 units per square kilometre in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 2013.
- What is the lowest emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1994.
- How does Belarus rank for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop?
- Belarus ranks 83rd out of 184 countries with data for 2019.
- Is emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 46.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 28 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.