How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?

28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Ecuador: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop

Belarus

0 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Ecuador

0 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Belarus rank

83rd

Ecuador rank

86th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop over time

Belarus
Ecuador

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 28 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ecuador ahead.

Belarus ranks 83rd and Ecuador ranks 86th of 184 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Ecuador	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 units per square kilometre	0.0001 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Ecuador
2000s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Ecuador
2010s	0 units per square kilometre	0.0001 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop, Belarus or Ecuador?: Belarus, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop between Belarus and Ecuador?: 0 units per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?: 28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2019.
How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5) - burning - crop?: Belarus ranks 83rd and Ecuador ranks 86th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Ecuador: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-burning-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/belarus/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-burning-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/belarus/ecuador/">Belarus vs Ecuador: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 184 places, 9,614 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 27 August 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.