Elite Consultations Score in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: Elite Consultations Score was -0.09 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
-0.09
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
126th
of 176 countries
All-time high
0.668
in 2018
All-time low
-2.18
in 1936
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Elite Consultations Score in Uzbekistan, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for elite consultations score in Uzbekistan is -0.09, measured in 2025.
The figure is up 89.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, elite consultations score in Uzbekistan peaked at 0.668 in 2018 and was at its lowest, -2.18, in 1936.
That places Uzbekistan 126th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Elite Consultations Score in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -0.779 | — |
| 1790 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -0.779 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.78 | +128.8% |
| 1827 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -0.726 | -59.3% |
| 1861 | -0.726 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -0.726 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.726 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -0.726 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -0.726 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -0.726 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -0.726 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -1.77 | +144.5% |
| 1869 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -1.77 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -0.808 | -54.5% |
| 1922 | -0.99 | +22.5% |
| 1923 | -0.99 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -0.99 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -1.26 | +27.3% |
| 1926 | -1.26 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.26 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.26 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -1.53 | +21.4% |
| 1930 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -2.02 | +31.8% |
| 1934 | -2.02 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -2.02 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -2.18 | +8.3% |
| 1937 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.78 | -18.4% |
| 1947 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -0.448 | -74.9% |
| 1955 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -0.556 | +24.1% |
| 1966 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -0.211 | -62.1% |
| 1986 | -0.374 | +77.3% |
| 1987 | -0.243 | -35.0% |
| 1988 | -0.243 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -0.015 | -93.8% |
| 1990 | -0.627 | +4080.0% |
| 1991 | -0.627 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.627 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -0.627 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.627 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.517 | -17.5% |
| 1996 | -0.504 | -2.5% |
| 1997 | -0.504 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -0.954 | +89.3% |
| 1999 | -1.03 | +8.1% |
| 2000 | -1.03 | -0.0% |
| 2001 | -1.56 | +51.7% |
| 2002 | -1.56 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -1.44 | -7.7% |
| 2004 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -1.48 | +2.2% |
| 2006 | -1.29 | -12.5% |
| 2007 | -1.24 | -3.6% |
| 2008 | -1.22 | -1.8% |
| 2009 | -1.18 | -3.0% |
| 2010 | -1.18 | -0.0% |
| 2011 | -1.18 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | -1.18 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -0.824 | -30.4% |
| 2014 | -0.824 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | -0.824 | -0.0% |
| 2016 | -0.267 | -67.6% |
| 2017 | 0.368 | -237.8% |
| 2018 | 0.668 | +81.5% |
| 2019 | 0.538 | -19.5% |
| 2020 | 0.372 | -30.9% |
| 2021 | -0.09 | -124.2% |
| 2022 | -0.09 | -0.0% |
| 2023 | -0.09 | -0.0% |
| 2024 | -0.09 | -0.0% |
| 2025 | -0.09 | -0.0% |
Uzbekistan compared with similar countries
- Uzbekistan's -0.09 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.213. (46 countries reporting)
- Uzbekistan's -0.09 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.46. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -0.779 | -0.779 | -0.779 | 1 |
| 1790s | -0.779 | -0.779 | -0.779 | 10 |
| 1800s | -0.779 | -0.779 | -0.779 | 10 |
| 1810s | -0.779 | -0.779 | -0.779 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.18 | -1.78 | -0.779 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.78 | -1.78 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.78 | -1.78 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.78 | -1.78 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1860s | -0.9358 | -1.77 | -0.726 | 10 |
| 1870s | -1.77 | -1.77 | -1.77 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.77 | -1.77 | -1.77 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.77 | -1.77 | -1.77 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.77 | -1.77 | -1.77 | 10 |
| 1910s | -1.77 | -1.77 | -1.77 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.21 | -1.77 | -0.808 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.94 | -2.18 | -1.53 | 10 |
| 1940s | -2.02 | -2.18 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.982 | -1.78 | -0.448 | 10 |
| 1960s | -0.502 | -0.556 | -0.448 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.556 | -0.556 | -0.556 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.3866 | -0.556 | -0.015 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.6645 | -1.03 | -0.504 | 10 |
| 2000s | -1.35 | -1.56 | -1.03 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.4717 | -1.18 | 0.668 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.013 | -0.09 | 0.372 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
More reference data data for Uzbekistan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2736 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 8.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 41.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.49 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is elite consultations score in Uzbekistan?
- Elite consultations score in Uzbekistan was -0.09 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest elite consultations score recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.668 in 2018.
- What is the lowest elite consultations score recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.18 in 1936.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for elite consultations score?
- Uzbekistan ranks 126th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is elite consultations score rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 89.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Elite Consultations Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites consult other elites across the political spectrum and from relevant sectors of society and business when considering important policy changes.