Elite Consultations Score in Mexico
Mexico: Elite Consultations Score was -0.128 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Elite Consultations Score in Mexico, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, elite consultations score in Mexico stood at -0.128.
The figure is up 57.6% on the previous year and down 108.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, elite consultations score in Mexico peaked at 1.55 in 2012 and was at its lowest, -2.3, in 1850.
Mexico ranks 127th of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Elite Consultations Score in Mexico, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -2.27 | — |
| 1790 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.115 | -105.1% |
| 1822 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | -2.3 | -2102.6% |
| 1851 | -2.3 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -2.3 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -2.3 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.125 | -105.4% |
| 1855 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | -1.52 | -1316.8% |
| 1877 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -1.52 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.641 | -57.9% |
| 1912 | -0.521 | -18.7% |
| 1913 | -1.23 | +136.9% |
| 1914 | -1.23 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.916 | -25.8% |
| 1916 | -0.916 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -0.916 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -0.698 | -23.8% |
| 1919 | -0.698 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -0.698 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -0.698 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -0.698 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -0.296 | -57.6% |
| 1924 | -0.296 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -0.296 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -0.296 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -0.296 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -0.296 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -0.027 | -90.9% |
| 1930 | -0.161 | +496.3% |
| 1931 | -0.161 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -0.161 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -0.161 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -0.161 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.151 | -193.8% |
| 1936 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | -0.153 | -201.3% |
| 1942 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1955 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -0.153 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.096 | -162.7% |
| 1977 | 0.096 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.096 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.096 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.096 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.096 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.096 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.096 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.096 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.096 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.096 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.473 | +392.7% |
| 1988 | 0.473 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.647 | +36.8% |
| 1990 | 0.647 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.647 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.647 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.647 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.647 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.647 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.647 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.647 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.647 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.647 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1.08 | +67.2% |
| 2001 | 1.55 | +43.1% |
| 2002 | 1.55 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1.55 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 1.55 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1.55 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 1.55 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1.49 | -3.9% |
| 2008 | 1.49 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1.49 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1.49 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 1.49 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 1.55 | +4.4% |
| 2013 | 1.51 | -2.5% |
| 2014 | 1.51 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1.45 | -3.9% |
| 2016 | 1.45 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.36 | -6.1% |
| 2018 | 0.659 | -51.7% |
| 2019 | 0.004 | -99.4% |
| 2020 | 0.149 | +3625.0% |
| 2021 | 0.191 | +28.2% |
| 2022 | 0.191 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.191 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | -0.302 | -258.1% |
| 2025 | -0.128 | -57.6% |
Mexico compared with similar countries
- Mexico's -0.128 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.478. (48 countries reporting)
- Mexico's -0.128 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -2.27 | -2.27 | -2.27 | 1 |
| 1790s | -2.27 | -2.27 | -2.27 | 10 |
| 1800s | -2.27 | -2.27 | -2.27 | 10 |
| 1810s | -2.27 | -2.27 | -2.27 | 10 |
| 1820s | -0.123 | -2.27 | 0.115 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.115 | 0.115 | 0.115 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.115 | 0.115 | 0.115 | 10 |
| 1850s | -0.8462 | -2.3 | 0.125 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 10 |
| 1870s | -0.5334 | -1.52 | 0.125 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.52 | -1.52 | -1.52 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.52 | -1.52 | -1.52 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.52 | -1.52 | -1.52 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.9295 | -1.52 | -0.521 | 10 |
| 1920s | -0.3897 | -0.698 | -0.027 | 10 |
| 1930s | -0.005 | -0.161 | 0.151 | 10 |
| 1940s | -0.1226 | -0.153 | 0.151 | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.153 | -0.153 | -0.153 | 10 |
| 1960s | -0.153 | -0.153 | -0.153 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.0534 | -0.153 | 0.096 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.2265 | 0.096 | 0.647 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.647 | 0.647 | 0.647 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.48 | 1.08 | 1.55 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.25 | 0.004 | 1.55 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0487 | -0.302 | 0.191 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
More reference data data for Mexico
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 16.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 32.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 32.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 7.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 84.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 157.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.55 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is elite consultations score in Mexico?
- Elite consultations score in Mexico was -0.128 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest elite consultations score recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 1.55 in 2012.
- What is the lowest elite consultations score recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.3 in 1850.
- How does Mexico rank for elite consultations score?
- Mexico ranks 127th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is elite consultations score rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is down 108.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Elite Consultations Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites consult other elites across the political spectrum and from relevant sectors of society and business when considering important policy changes.