Elite Consultations Score in Chile
Chile: Elite Consultations Score was 2.6 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
2.6
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
9th
of 176 countries
All-time high
2.65
in 2006
All-time low
-2.32
in 1814
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Elite Consultations Score in Chile, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Chile recorded 2.6 for elite consultations score in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 14.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, elite consultations score in Chile peaked at 2.65 in 2006 and was at its lowest, -2.32, in 1814.
That places Chile 9th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Elite Consultations Score in Chile, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -1.92 | — |
| 1790 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.73 | -9.9% |
| 1811 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -2.32 | +34.6% |
| 1815 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.71 | -26.5% |
| 1819 | -1.71 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.71 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.71 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.71 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.16 | -32.1% |
| 1824 | -1.16 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.16 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.16 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.16 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.16 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.16 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.72 | +48.7% |
| 1831 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -0.364 | -78.9% |
| 1841 | -0.364 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -0.364 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -0.364 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -0.364 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -0.364 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -0.364 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -0.364 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -0.364 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -0.364 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -0.964 | +164.8% |
| 1851 | -1.75 | +81.2% |
| 1852 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.155 | -108.9% |
| 1861 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | -0.898 | -679.4% |
| 1891 | -1.74 | +93.3% |
| 1892 | -0.576 | -66.8% |
| 1893 | -0.328 | -43.1% |
| 1894 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.086 | -73.8% |
| 1913 | -0.086 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -0.086 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.086 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -0.086 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -0.086 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -0.086 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -0.086 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.014 | -116.3% |
| 1921 | 0.014 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.014 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.014 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.014 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | -0.228 | -1728.6% |
| 1926 | -0.44 | +93.0% |
| 1927 | -0.44 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -0.44 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -0.44 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -0.44 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -0.44 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.303 | -168.9% |
| 1933 | 0.303 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.303 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.303 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.303 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.303 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.813 | +168.3% |
| 1939 | 0.813 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.686 | -15.6% |
| 1941 | 0.686 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.686 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.686 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.686 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.686 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.581 | -15.3% |
| 1947 | 0.383 | -34.1% |
| 1948 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.218 | -43.1% |
| 1950 | 0.218 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.218 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.019 | -91.3% |
| 1953 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.438 | +2205.3% |
| 1959 | 0.331 | -24.4% |
| 1960 | 0.331 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.331 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.331 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.331 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.706 | +113.3% |
| 1965 | 0.999 | +41.5% |
| 1966 | 0.999 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.999 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.999 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.999 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.999 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.999 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.808 | -19.1% |
| 1973 | -0.217 | -126.9% |
| 1974 | -1.84 | +747.5% |
| 1975 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -1.5 | -18.2% |
| 1981 | -1.5 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -1.5 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -1.05 | -30.1% |
| 1984 | -1.23 | +16.6% |
| 1985 | -1.23 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -0.814 | -33.7% |
| 1987 | -0.814 | -0.0% |
| 1988 | -0.814 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -0.062 | -92.4% |
| 1990 | 1.99 | -3316.1% |
| 1991 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 2.22 | +11.2% |
| 2001 | 2.22 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 2.22 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1.91 | -14.0% |
| 2004 | 2.36 | +23.9% |
| 2005 | 2.47 | +4.5% |
| 2006 | 2.65 | +7.4% |
| 2007 | 2.65 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2.65 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2.65 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1.91 | -28.1% |
| 2011 | 1.88 | -1.5% |
| 2012 | 2.02 | +7.7% |
| 2013 | 1.73 | -14.7% |
| 2014 | 2.07 | +19.9% |
| 2015 | 2.27 | +9.5% |
| 2016 | 2.27 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.85 | -18.2% |
| 2018 | 1.63 | -12.1% |
| 2019 | 1.78 | +9.6% |
| 2020 | 1.92 | +7.3% |
| 2021 | 2.32 | +21.1% |
| 2022 | 2.6 | +11.9% |
| 2023 | 2.6 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2.6 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2.6 | +0.0% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 2.6 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.69, 1.5× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Chile's 2.6 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1, 2.6× the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -1.92 | -1.92 | -1.92 | 1 |
| 1790s | -1.91 | -1.92 | -1.92 | 10 |
| 1800s | -1.91 | -1.92 | -1.92 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.96 | -2.32 | -1.71 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.32 | -1.71 | -1.16 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.72 | -1.72 | -1.72 | 10 |
| 1840s | -0.364 | -0.364 | -0.364 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.67 | -1.75 | -0.964 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.155 | 0.155 | 0.155 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.155 | 0.155 | 0.155 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.155 | 0.155 | 0.155 | 10 |
| 1890s | -0.5506 | -1.74 | -0.328 | 10 |
| 1900s | -0.328 | -0.328 | -0.328 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.1344 | -0.328 | -0.086 | 10 |
| 1920s | -0.1918 | -0.44 | 0.014 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.2564 | -0.44 | 0.813 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.5681 | 0.218 | 0.686 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.1319 | 0.019 | 0.438 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.7025 | 0.331 | 0.999 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.8445 | -1.84 | 0.999 | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.05 | -1.5 | -0.062 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.99 | 1.99 | 1.99 | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.4 | 1.91 | 2.65 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.94 | 1.63 | 2.27 | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.44 | 1.92 | 2.6 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Chile
More reference data data for Chile
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9268 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2204 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is elite consultations score in Chile?
- Elite consultations score in Chile was 2.6 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest elite consultations score recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 2.65 in 2006.
- What is the lowest elite consultations score recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.32 in 1814.
- How does Chile rank for elite consultations score?
- Chile ranks 9th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is elite consultations score rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 14.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Elite Consultations Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites consult other elites across the political spectrum and from relevant sectors of society and business when considering important policy changes.