Elite consultations score in Chile
Chile: Elite consultations score was 2.6 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
2.6
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
9th
of 176 countries
All-time high
2.65
in 2006
All-time low
-2.32
in 1814
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Elite consultations score in Chile, 1789–2025
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Chile recorded 2.6 for elite consultations score in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 14.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, elite consultations score in Chile peaked at 2.65 in 2006 and was at its lowest, -2.32, in 1814.
That places Chile 9th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Elite consultations score in Chile, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -1.92 | — |
| 1790 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.73 | -9.9% |
| 1811 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -2.32 | +34.6% |
| 1815 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.71 | -26.5% |
| 1819 | -1.71 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.71 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.71 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.71 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.16 | -32.1% |
| 1824 | -1.16 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.16 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.16 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.16 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.16 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.16 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.72 | +48.7% |
| 1831 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.72 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -0.364 | -78.9% |
| 1841 | -0.364 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -0.364 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -0.364 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -0.364 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -0.364 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -0.364 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -0.364 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -0.364 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -0.364 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -0.964 | +164.8% |
| 1851 | -1.75 | +81.2% |
| 1852 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.155 | -108.9% |
| 1861 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.155 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | -0.898 | -679.4% |
| 1891 | -1.74 | +93.3% |
| 1892 | -0.576 | -66.8% |
| 1893 | -0.328 | -43.1% |
| 1894 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.328 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.086 | -73.8% |
| 1913 | -0.086 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -0.086 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.086 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -0.086 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -0.086 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -0.086 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -0.086 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.014 | -116.3% |
| 1921 | 0.014 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.014 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.014 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.014 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | -0.228 | -1728.6% |
| 1926 | -0.44 | +93.0% |
| 1927 | -0.44 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -0.44 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -0.44 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -0.44 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -0.44 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.303 | -168.9% |
| 1933 | 0.303 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.303 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.303 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.303 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.303 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.813 | +168.3% |
| 1939 | 0.813 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.686 | -15.6% |
| 1941 | 0.686 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.686 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.686 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.686 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.686 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.581 | -15.3% |
| 1947 | 0.383 | -34.1% |
| 1948 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.218 | -43.1% |
| 1950 | 0.218 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.218 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.019 | -91.3% |
| 1953 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.019 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.438 | +2205.3% |
| 1959 | 0.331 | -24.4% |
| 1960 | 0.331 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.331 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.331 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.331 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.706 | +113.3% |
| 1965 | 0.999 | +41.5% |
| 1966 | 0.999 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.999 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.999 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.999 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.999 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.999 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.808 | -19.1% |
| 1973 | -0.217 | -126.9% |
| 1974 | -1.84 | +747.5% |
| 1975 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -1.84 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -1.5 | -18.2% |
| 1981 | -1.5 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -1.5 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -1.05 | -30.1% |
| 1984 | -1.23 | +16.6% |
| 1985 | -1.23 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -0.814 | -33.7% |
| 1987 | -0.814 | -0.0% |
| 1988 | -0.814 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -0.062 | -92.4% |
| 1990 | 1.99 | -3316.1% |
| 1991 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 2.22 | +11.2% |
| 2001 | 2.22 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 2.22 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1.91 | -14.0% |
| 2004 | 2.36 | +23.9% |
| 2005 | 2.47 | +4.5% |
| 2006 | 2.65 | +7.4% |
| 2007 | 2.65 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2.65 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2.65 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1.91 | -28.1% |
| 2011 | 1.88 | -1.5% |
| 2012 | 2.02 | +7.7% |
| 2013 | 1.73 | -14.7% |
| 2014 | 2.07 | +19.9% |
| 2015 | 2.27 | +9.5% |
| 2016 | 2.27 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.85 | -18.2% |
| 2018 | 1.63 | -12.1% |
| 2019 | 1.78 | +9.6% |
| 2020 | 1.92 | +7.3% |
| 2021 | 2.32 | +21.1% |
| 2022 | 2.6 | +11.9% |
| 2023 | 2.6 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2.6 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2.6 | +0.0% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 2.6 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.69, 1.5× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Chile's 2.6 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1, 2.6× the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -1.92 | -1.92 | -1.92 | 1 |
| 1790s | -1.91 | -1.92 | -1.92 | 10 |
| 1800s | -1.91 | -1.92 | -1.92 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.96 | -2.32 | -1.71 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.32 | -1.71 | -1.16 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.72 | -1.72 | -1.72 | 10 |
| 1840s | -0.364 | -0.364 | -0.364 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.67 | -1.75 | -0.964 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.155 | 0.155 | 0.155 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.155 | 0.155 | 0.155 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.155 | 0.155 | 0.155 | 10 |
| 1890s | -0.5506 | -1.74 | -0.328 | 10 |
| 1900s | -0.328 | -0.328 | -0.328 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.1344 | -0.328 | -0.086 | 10 |
| 1920s | -0.1918 | -0.44 | 0.014 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.2564 | -0.44 | 0.813 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.5681 | 0.218 | 0.686 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.1319 | 0.019 | 0.438 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.7025 | 0.331 | 0.999 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.8445 | -1.84 | 0.999 | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.05 | -1.5 | -0.062 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.99 | 1.99 | 1.99 | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.4 | 1.91 | 2.65 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.94 | 1.63 | 2.27 | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.44 | 1.92 | 2.6 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Chile
More reference data data for Chile
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9268 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2204 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is elite consultations score in Chile?
- Elite consultations score in Chile was 2.6 in 2025, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest elite consultations score recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 2.65 in 2006.
- What is the lowest elite consultations score recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.32 in 1814.
- How does Chile rank for elite consultations score?
- Chile ranks 9th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is elite consultations score rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 14.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Elite consultations score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).