Elite consultations score in Brazil
Brazil: Elite consultations score was 2.66 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
2.66
Change on year
down 7.8%
World rank
8th
of 176 countries
All-time high
2.88
in 2023
All-time low
-2.14
in 1890
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Elite consultations score in Brazil, 1789–2025
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for elite consultations score in Brazil is 2.66, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 7.8% on the previous year and up 11.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, elite consultations score in Brazil peaked at 2.88 in 2023 and was at its lowest, -2.14, in 1890.
Brazil ranks 8th of 176 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Elite consultations score in Brazil, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -2.12 | — |
| 1790 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -2.12 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -0.7 | -67.0% |
| 1833 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -0.7 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -2.14 | +206.1% |
| 1891 | -2.14 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -2.14 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -2.14 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -2.14 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -0.283 | -86.8% |
| 1896 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.555 | -296.1% |
| 1931 | 0.555 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.555 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.555 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.555 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.555 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.555 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | -0.116 | -120.9% |
| 1938 | -0.116 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -0.116 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -0.116 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -0.116 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -0.116 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -0.116 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -0.116 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -0.116 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.831 | -816.4% |
| 1947 | 0.831 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.831 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.831 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.831 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.831 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.831 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.831 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.831 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.831 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.831 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.831 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.831 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.831 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.831 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.831 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 1.1 | +31.9% |
| 1963 | 1.1 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | -0.381 | -134.8% |
| 1965 | -0.104 | -72.7% |
| 1966 | -0.104 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -0.462 | +344.2% |
| 1968 | -0.462 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -0.462 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -0.462 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -0.462 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -0.462 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -0.462 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -0.462 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -0.104 | -77.5% |
| 1976 | -0.104 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -0.104 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -0.104 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -0.104 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.104 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -0.104 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -0.104 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -0.104 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.104 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -0.104 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.825 | -893.3% |
| 1987 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.16 | +40.5% |
| 1993 | 1.16 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 1.34 | +16.0% |
| 1995 | 1.34 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1.34 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 1.34 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1.34 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 1.34 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1.34 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 1.34 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 2.05 | +52.3% |
| 2003 | 2.05 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 2.05 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 2.7 | +31.8% |
| 2006 | 2.7 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2.7 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2.7 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2.7 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2.77 | +2.6% |
| 2011 | 2.6 | -6.1% |
| 2012 | 2.6 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2.6 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2.6 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2.38 | -8.6% |
| 2016 | 1.22 | -48.9% |
| 2017 | 1.48 | +21.4% |
| 2018 | 1.11 | -24.9% |
| 2019 | 1.04 | -6.3% |
| 2020 | 0.967 | -6.8% |
| 2021 | 1.07 | +11.1% |
| 2022 | 1.44 | +34.0% |
| 2023 | 2.88 | +100.4% |
| 2024 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2.66 | -7.8% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 2.66 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.478, 5.6× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 2.66 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1, 2.7× the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -2.12 | -2.12 | -2.12 | 1 |
| 1790s | -2.12 | -2.12 | -2.12 | 10 |
| 1800s | -2.12 | -2.12 | -2.12 | 10 |
| 1810s | -2.12 | -2.12 | -2.12 | 10 |
| 1820s | -2.12 | -2.12 | -2.12 | 10 |
| 1830s | -0.9842 | -2.12 | -0.7 | 10 |
| 1840s | -0.7 | -0.7 | -0.7 | 10 |
| 1850s | -0.7 | -0.7 | -0.7 | 10 |
| 1860s | -0.7 | -0.7 | -0.7 | 10 |
| 1870s | -0.7 | -0.7 | -0.7 | 10 |
| 1880s | -0.7 | -0.7 | -0.7 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.21 | -2.14 | -0.283 | 10 |
| 1900s | -0.283 | -0.283 | -0.283 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.283 | -0.283 | -0.283 | 10 |
| 1920s | -0.283 | -0.283 | -0.283 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.3537 | -0.116 | 0.555 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.2628 | -0.116 | 0.831 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.831 | 0.831 | 0.831 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.1879 | -0.462 | 1.1 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.283 | -0.462 | -0.104 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.2676 | -0.104 | 0.825 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.2 | 0.825 | 1.34 | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.23 | 1.34 | 2.7 | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.04 | 1.04 | 2.77 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.98 | 0.967 | 2.88 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
More reference data data for Brazil
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 72.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 46.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 18.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 405.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 699.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 49.04 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is elite consultations score in Brazil?
- Elite consultations score in Brazil was 2.66 in 2025, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest elite consultations score recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 2.88 in 2023.
- What is the lowest elite consultations score recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.14 in 1890.
- How does Brazil rank for elite consultations score?
- Brazil ranks 8th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is elite consultations score rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Elite consultations score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).