Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods was 0.6 in 2023. ▲ Rising
Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Zimbabwe, 2016–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
In 2023, dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Zimbabwe stood at 0.6. That is the highest value across all 8 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 71.4% over ten years.
Zimbabwe ranks 93rd of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 4 |
| 2020s | 0.575 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 93 Botswana 0.6 compare
- 93 China 0.6 compare
- 93 Ecuador 0.6 compare
- 93 Eswatini 0.6 compare
- 93 Fiji 0.6 compare
- 93 Ghana 0.6 compare
- 93 Kuwait 0.6 compare
- 93 Lesotho 0.6 compare
- 93 Liberia 0.6 compare
- 93 Maldives 0.6 compare
- 93 Mauritania 0.6 compare
- 93 Mozambique 0.6 compare
- 93 Myanmar 0.6 compare
- 93 Namibia 0.6 compare
- 93 Pakistan 0.6 compare
- 93 Panama 0.6 compare
- 93 Samoa 0.6 compare
- 93 Sri Lanka 0.6 compare
- 93 Togo 0.6 compare
- 93 Tunisia 0.6 compare
More reference data data for Zimbabwe
- Spring temperature anomalies -0.1903 °C (2026)
- Summer temperature anomalies 0.8086 °C (2026)
- Temperature anomalies by month -0.5886 °C (2026)
- Exchange rate, new LCU per USD extended backward, period average 60,892 (2025)
- Exchange rate, old LCU per USD extended forward, period average 60,892 (2025)
- Official exchange rate, LCU per USD, period average 60,892 (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
- Autumn temperature anomalies 1.68 °C (2025)
- Winter temperature anomalies -0.7408 °C (2025)
- Consumer price index 11,077 2010 = 100 (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Zimbabwe?
- Dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Zimbabwe was 0.6 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 0.6 in 2021.
- What is the lowest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.35 in 2016.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for dimension 5.2: standards and methods?
- Zimbabwe ranks 93rd out of 188 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 5.2: standards and methods rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is up 71.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Average score for Standards and Methods indicators. Internationally accepted and recommended methodology, classifications and standards provide the basis for national statistical offices (NSOs) on data integration, facilitating data exchange and providing the foundation for the preparation of relevant statistical indicators. The following methods and standards are considered: System of national accounts in use, National Accounts base year, Classification of national industry, CPI base year, Classification of household consumption, Classification of status of employment, Central government accounting status, Compilation of government finance statistics, Compilation of monetary and financial statistics, Business process. . Further work could improve the validity of this indicator and reduce the risk that countries may be incentivized to adopt only traditional standards and methods and neglect innovative solutions that may be more valid in the current context.