Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Pakistan
Pakistan: Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods was 0.6 in 2023. ▲ Rising
Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Pakistan, 2016–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
In 2023, dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Pakistan stood at 0.6. That is the highest value across all 8 years on record.
That represents a change of up 71.4% over ten years.
That places Pakistan 93rd out of 188 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.325 | 0.3 | 0.35 | 4 |
| 2020s | 0.5125 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Pakistan
- 93 Botswana 0.6 compare
- 93 China 0.6 compare
- 93 Ecuador 0.6 compare
- 93 Eswatini 0.6 compare
- 93 Fiji 0.6 compare
- 93 Ghana 0.6 compare
- 93 Kuwait 0.6 compare
- 93 Lesotho 0.6 compare
- 93 Liberia 0.6 compare
- 93 Maldives 0.6 compare
- 93 Mauritania 0.6 compare
- 93 Mozambique 0.6 compare
- 93 Myanmar 0.6 compare
- 93 Namibia 0.6 compare
- 93 Panama 0.6 compare
- 93 Samoa 0.6 compare
- 93 Sri Lanka 0.6 compare
- 93 Togo 0.6 compare
- 93 Tunisia 0.6 compare
- 93 Zimbabwe 0.6 compare
More reference data data for Pakistan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 6.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 20.96 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 61.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 61.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 20.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 91.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 260 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 10.79 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Pakistan?
- Dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Pakistan was 0.6 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.6 in 2022.
- What is the lowest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3 in 2017.
- How does Pakistan rank for dimension 5.2: standards and methods?
- Pakistan ranks 93rd out of 188 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 5.2: standards and methods rising or falling in Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 71.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Average score for Standards and Methods indicators. Internationally accepted and recommended methodology, classifications and standards provide the basis for national statistical offices (NSOs) on data integration, facilitating data exchange and providing the foundation for the preparation of relevant statistical indicators. The following methods and standards are considered: System of national accounts in use, National Accounts base year, Classification of national industry, CPI base year, Classification of household consumption, Classification of status of employment, Central government accounting status, Compilation of government finance statistics, Compilation of monetary and financial statistics, Business process. . Further work could improve the validity of this indicator and reduce the risk that countries may be incentivized to adopt only traditional standards and methods and neglect innovative solutions that may be more valid in the current context.