Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Palestine
Palestine: Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods was 0.85 in 2023. ▲ Rising
Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Palestine, 2017–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
The most recent figure for dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Palestine is 0.85, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
The figure is up 54.5% over ten years.
Palestine ranks 48th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5833 | 0.55 | 0.6 | 3 |
| 2020s | 0.8125 | 0.7 | 0.85 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Palestine
- 48 Colombia 0.85 compare
- 48 Costa Rica 0.85 compare
- 48 Kyrgyzstan 0.85 compare
- 48 Malta 0.85 compare
- 48 Mexico 0.85 compare
- 48 Romania 0.85 compare
- 48 Serbia 0.85 compare
- 48 South Africa 0.85 compare
- 48 Thailand 0.85 compare
- 48 United Arab Emirates 0.85 compare
More reference data data for Palestine
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 169.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.7088 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6383 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0127 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0193 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 8.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.022 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 5.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0005 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 187.82 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Palestine?
- Dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Palestine was 0.85 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Palestine?
- The highest recorded value was 0.85 in 2021.
- What is the lowest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Palestine?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.55 in 2017.
- How does Palestine rank for dimension 5.2: standards and methods?
- Palestine ranks 48th out of 188 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 5.2: standards and methods rising or falling in Palestine?
- Over the last ten years it is up 54.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Palestine data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Average score for Standards and Methods indicators. Internationally accepted and recommended methodology, classifications and standards provide the basis for national statistical offices (NSOs) on data integration, facilitating data exchange and providing the foundation for the preparation of relevant statistical indicators. The following methods and standards are considered: System of national accounts in use, National Accounts base year, Classification of national industry, CPI base year, Classification of household consumption, Classification of status of employment, Central government accounting status, Compilation of government finance statistics, Compilation of monetary and financial statistics, Business process. . Further work could improve the validity of this indicator and reduce the risk that countries may be incentivized to adopt only traditional standards and methods and neglect innovative solutions that may be more valid in the current context.