Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Kosovo
Kosovo: Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods was 0.85 in 2023. ▲ Rising
Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Kosovo, 2017–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
Kosovo recorded 0.85 for dimension 5.2: standards and methods in 2023. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
That represents a change of up 6.2% on the previous year and up 54.5% over ten years.
Kosovo ranks 48th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Kosovo, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 0.55 | — |
| 2018 | 0.55 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.6 | +9.1% |
| 2020 | 0.6 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.75 | +25.0% |
| 2022 | 0.8 | +6.7% |
| 2023 | 0.85 | +6.2% |
Kosovo compared with similar countries
- Kosovo's 0.85 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.65, 1.3× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Kosovo's 0.85 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.95, 89% of the median. (50 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5667 | 0.55 | 0.6 | 3 |
| 2020s | 0.75 | 0.6 | 0.85 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Kosovo
- 48 Colombia 0.85 compare
- 48 Costa Rica 0.85 compare
- 48 Kyrgyzstan 0.85 compare
- 48 Malta 0.85 compare
- 48 Mexico 0.85 compare
- 48 Romania 0.85 compare
- 48 Serbia 0.85 compare
- 48 South Africa 0.85 compare
- 48 Thailand 0.85 compare
- 48 United Arab Emirates 0.85 compare
- 48 Palestine 0.85 compare
- 48 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 0.85 compare
More reference data data for Kosovo
- Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5), gaps filled 0.0521 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to) 0.1596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) -0.3219 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) -0.2547 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Rule of Law - Governance score 57.86 0-100 (2024)
- Rule of Law - Governance estimate 0.0521 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Voice and Accountability - Governance score 59.64 0-100 (2024)
- Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate 0.1596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Political Stability - Governance score 60.4 0-100 (2024)
- Political Stability - Governance estimate -0.3219 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Kosovo?
- Dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Kosovo was 0.85 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Kosovo?
- The highest recorded value was 0.85 in 2023.
- What is the lowest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Kosovo?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.55 in 2017.
- How does Kosovo rank for dimension 5.2: standards and methods?
- Kosovo ranks 48th out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 5.2: standards and methods rising or falling in Kosovo?
- Over the last ten years it is up 54.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kosovo data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Average score for Standards and Methods indicators. Internationally accepted and recommended methodology, classifications and standards provide the basis for national statistical offices (NSOs) on data integration, facilitating data exchange and providing the foundation for the preparation of relevant statistical indicators. The following methods and standards are considered: System of national accounts in use, National Accounts base year, Classification of national industry, CPI base year, Classification of household consumption, Classification of status of employment, Central government accounting status, Compilation of government finance statistics, Compilation of monetary and financial statistics, Business process. . Further work could improve the validity of this indicator and reduce the risk that countries may be incentivized to adopt only traditional standards and methods and neglect innovative solutions that may be more valid in the current context.