Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Austria
Austria: Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods was 1 in 2023. ▬ Flat
Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Austria, 2016–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
Austria recorded 1 for dimension 5.2: standards and methods in 2023. That is the highest value across all 8 years on record.
The figure is up 5.3% on the previous year and unchanged over ten years.
Austria ranks 1st of 188 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.9875 | 0.95 | 1 | 4 |
| 2020s | 0.975 | 0.95 | 1 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Austria
- 1 Australia 1 compare
- 1 Belgium 1 compare
- 1 Canada 1 compare
- 1 Denmark 1 compare
- 1 Estonia 1 compare
- 1 Finland 1 compare
- 1 France 1 compare
- 1 Greece 1 compare
- 1 Hungary 1 compare
- 1 Iceland 1 compare
- 1 Ireland 1 compare
- 1 Israel 1 compare
- 1 Italy 1 compare
- 1 Latvia 1 compare
- 1 Lithuania 1 compare
- 1 Luxembourg 1 compare
- 1 Netherlands 1 compare
- 1 New Zealand 1 compare
- 1 Norway 1 compare
- 1 Poland 1 compare
- 1 Portugal 1 compare
- 1 Slovakia 1 compare
- 1 Slovenia 1 compare
- 1 Spain 1 compare
- 1 Sweden 1 compare
- 1 Turkey 1 compare
- 1 United States 1 compare
More reference data data for Austria
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6222 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2597 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1986 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.09 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.08 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Austria?
- Dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Austria was 1 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Austria?
- The highest recorded value was 1 in 2016.
- What is the lowest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Austria?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.95 in 2019.
- How does Austria rank for dimension 5.2: standards and methods?
- Austria ranks 1st out of 188 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 5.2: standards and methods rising or falling in Austria?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Austria data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Average score for Standards and Methods indicators. Internationally accepted and recommended methodology, classifications and standards provide the basis for national statistical offices (NSOs) on data integration, facilitating data exchange and providing the foundation for the preparation of relevant statistical indicators. The following methods and standards are considered: System of national accounts in use, National Accounts base year, Classification of national industry, CPI base year, Classification of household consumption, Classification of status of employment, Central government accounting status, Compilation of government finance statistics, Compilation of monetary and financial statistics, Business process. . Further work could improve the validity of this indicator and reduce the risk that countries may be incentivized to adopt only traditional standards and methods and neglect innovative solutions that may be more valid in the current context.