Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Australia

Australia: Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods was 1 in 2023. ▬ Flat

Latest (2023)
1
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 188 countries
All-time high
1
in 2016
All-time low
1
in 2016
Years of data
8
2016–2023

Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Australia, 2016–2023

00.20.40.60.812016201920232016: 12017: 12018: 12019: 12020: 12021: 12022: 12023: 1

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).

Analysis

The most recent figure for dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Australia is 1, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 8 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Australia ranks 1st of 188 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 1 1 1 4
2020s 1 1 1 4

Countries ranked near Australia

  1. 1 Austria 1 compare
  2. 1 Belgium 1 compare
  3. 1 Canada 1 compare
  4. 1 Denmark 1 compare
  5. 1 Estonia 1 compare
  6. 1 Finland 1 compare
  7. 1 France 1 compare
  8. 1 Greece 1 compare
  9. 1 Hungary 1 compare
  10. 1 Iceland 1 compare
  11. 1 Ireland 1 compare
  12. 1 Israel 1 compare
  13. 1 Italy 1 compare
  14. 1 Latvia 1 compare
  15. 1 Lithuania 1 compare
  16. 1 Luxembourg 1 compare
  17. 1 Netherlands 1 compare
  18. 1 New Zealand 1 compare
  19. 1 Norway 1 compare
  20. 1 Poland 1 compare
  21. 1 Portugal 1 compare
  22. 1 Slovakia 1 compare
  23. 1 Slovenia 1 compare
  24. 1 Spain 1 compare
  25. 1 Sweden 1 compare
  26. 1 Turkey 1 compare
  27. 1 United States 1 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Australia

All data for Australia →

Frequently asked questions

What is dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Australia?
Dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Australia was 1 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
What is the highest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Australia?
The highest recorded value was 1 in 2016.
What is the lowest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Australia?
The lowest recorded value was 1 in 2016.
How does Australia rank for dimension 5.2: standards and methods?
Australia ranks 1st out of 188 countries with data for 2023.
Is dimension 5.2: standards and methods rising or falling in Australia?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Australia data come from?
The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,515 data points, 2016–2023
Last refreshed

Average score for Standards and Methods indicators. Internationally accepted and recommended methodology, classifications and standards provide the basis for national statistical offices (NSOs) on data integration, facilitating data exchange and providing the foundation for the preparation of relevant statistical indicators. The following methods and standards are considered: System of national accounts in use, National Accounts base year, Classification of national industry, CPI base year, Classification of household consumption, Classification of status of employment, Central government accounting status, Compilation of government finance statistics, Compilation of monetary and financial statistics, Business process. . Further work could improve the validity of this indicator and reduce the risk that countries may be incentivized to adopt only traditional standards and methods and neglect innovative solutions that may be more valid in the current context.