Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance in Sao Tome and Principe
Sao Tome and Principe: Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance was 1 in 2023. ▬ Flat
Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance in Sao Tome and Principe, 2019–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
In 2023, dimension 5.1: legislation and governance in Sao Tome and Principe stood at 1. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st of 152 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sao Tome and Principe
- 1 Albania 1 compare
- 1 Algeria 1 compare
- 1 Andorra 1 compare
- 1 Argentina 1 compare
- 1 Armenia 1 compare
- 1 Australia 1 compare
- 1 Austria 1 compare
- 1 Belarus 1 compare
- 1 Belgium 1 compare
- 1 Belize 1 compare
- 1 Bolivia 1 compare
- 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 compare
- 1 Botswana 1 compare
- 1 Bulgaria 1 compare
- 1 Burundi 1 compare
- 1 Cape Verde 1 compare
- 1 Cambodia 1 compare
- 1 Cameroon 1 compare
- 1 Canada 1 compare
- 1 Central African Republic 1 compare
- 1 Chile 1 compare
- 1 China (People's Republic of) 1 compare
- 1 Colombia 1 compare
- 1 Comoros 1 compare
- 1 Congo 1 compare
- 1 Costa Rica 1 compare
- 1 Cote d'Ivoire 1 compare
- 1 Croatia 1 compare
- 1 Cyprus 1 compare
- 1 Czechia 1 compare
- 1 Denmark 1 compare
- 1 Dominica 1 compare
- 1 Equatorial Guinea 1 compare
- 1 Estonia 1 compare
- 1 Eswatini 1 compare
- 1 Faroe Islands 1 compare
- 1 Finland 1 compare
- 1 France 1 compare
- 1 Gabon 1 compare
- 1 Gambia 1 compare
- 1 Georgia 1 compare
- 1 Germany 1 compare
- 1 Greece 1 compare
- 1 Guinea 1 compare
- 1 Honduras 1 compare
- 1 Hong Kong 1 compare
- 1 Hungary 1 compare
- 1 Iceland 1 compare
- 1 India 1 compare
- 1 Indonesia 1 compare
- 1 Iran 1 compare
- 1 Iraq 1 compare
- 1 Ireland 1 compare
- 1 Israel 1 compare
- 1 Italy 1 compare
- 1 Japan 1 compare
- 1 Jordan 1 compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 1 compare
- 1 Korea 1 compare
- 1 Kuwait 1 compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 1 compare
- 1 Latvia 1 compare
- 1 Liberia 1 compare
- 1 Libya 1 compare
- 1 Liechtenstein 1 compare
- 1 Lithuania 1 compare
- 1 Luxembourg 1 compare
- 1 Macao 1 compare
- 1 Madagascar 1 compare
- 1 Maldives 1 compare
- 1 Mali 1 compare
- 1 Malta 1 compare
- 1 Mauritania 1 compare
- 1 Mauritius 1 compare
- 1 Mexico 1 compare
- 1 Moldova 1 compare
- 1 Mongolia 1 compare
- 1 Nauru 1 compare
- 1 Nepal 1 compare
- 1 Netherlands 1 compare
- 1 New Caledonia 1 compare
- 1 New Zealand 1 compare
- 1 Niger 1 compare
- 1 North Macedonia 1 compare
- 1 Northern Mariana Islands 1 compare
- 1 Norway 1 compare
- 1 Oman 1 compare
- 1 Pakistan 1 compare
- 1 Palau 1 compare
- 1 Panama 1 compare
- 1 Paraguay 1 compare
- 1 Philippines 1 compare
- 1 Poland 1 compare
- 1 Portugal 1 compare
- 1 Puerto Rico 1 compare
- 1 Qatar 1 compare
- 1 Romania 1 compare
- 1 Russia 1 compare
- 1 Samoa 1 compare
- 1 Saudi Arabia 1 compare
- 1 Senegal 1 compare
- 1 Serbia 1 compare
- 1 Singapore 1 compare
- 1 Slovak Republic 1 compare
- 1 Slovenia 1 compare
- 1 South Africa 1 compare
- 1 South Sudan 1 compare
- 1 Spain 1 compare
- 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 compare
- 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1 compare
- 1 Sudan 1 compare
- 1 Suriname 1 compare
- 1 Sweden 1 compare
- 1 Switzerland 1 compare
- 1 Tajikistan 1 compare
- 1 Tanzania 1 compare
- 1 Thailand 1 compare
- 1 East Timor 1 compare
- 1 Togo 1 compare
- 1 Tonga 1 compare
- 1 Türkiye 1 compare
- 1 Uganda 1 compare
- 1 Ukraine 1 compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 1 compare
- 1 United Kingdom 1 compare
- 1 United States 1 compare
- 1 Uruguay 1 compare
- 1 Uzbekistan 1 compare
- 1 Vanuatu 1 compare
- 1 Palestine 1 compare
More reference data data for Sao Tome and Principe
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0038 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.006 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0003 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0126 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.014 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0319 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0601 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0015 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 5.1: legislation and governance in Sao Tome and Principe?
- Dimension 5.1: legislation and governance in Sao Tome and Principe was 1 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 5.1: legislation and governance recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?
- The highest recorded value was 1 in 2019.
- What is the lowest dimension 5.1: legislation and governance recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?
- The lowest recorded value was 1 in 2019.
- How does Sao Tome and Principe rank for dimension 5.1: legislation and governance?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st out of 152 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this Sao Tome and Principe data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Included in dashboard, but not index because of insufficient country coverage. This indicator is based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 (national statistical legislation compliance with UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics), existence of National Statistical Council, national statistical strategy generation, national statistical plan. Limited country coverage makes cross country comparison limited. A global database of statistical and data legislation and governance practice would be a valuable resource for capacity building in general not just for the SPI.