Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance in Botswana
Botswana: Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance was 1 in 2023. ▬ Flat
Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance in Botswana, 2019–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
The most recent figure for dimension 5.1: legislation and governance in Botswana is 1, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.
Botswana ranks 1st of 151 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Botswana
- 1 Albania 1 compare
- 1 Algeria 1 compare
- 1 Andorra 1 compare
- 1 Argentina 1 compare
- 1 Armenia 1 compare
- 1 Australia 1 compare
- 1 Austria 1 compare
- 1 Belarus 1 compare
- 1 Belgium 1 compare
- 1 Belize 1 compare
- 1 Bolivia 1 compare
- 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 compare
- 1 Bulgaria 1 compare
- 1 Burundi 1 compare
- 1 Cape Verde 1 compare
- 1 Cambodia 1 compare
- 1 Cameroon 1 compare
- 1 Canada 1 compare
- 1 Central African Republic 1 compare
- 1 Chile 1 compare
- 1 China 1 compare
- 1 Colombia 1 compare
- 1 Comoros 1 compare
- 1 Congo 1 compare
- 1 Costa Rica 1 compare
- 1 Cote d'Ivoire 1 compare
- 1 Croatia 1 compare
- 1 Cyprus 1 compare
- 1 Czechia 1 compare
- 1 Denmark 1 compare
- 1 Dominica 1 compare
- 1 Equatorial Guinea 1 compare
- 1 Estonia 1 compare
- 1 Eswatini 1 compare
- 1 Faroe Islands 1 compare
- 1 Finland 1 compare
- 1 France 1 compare
- 1 Gabon 1 compare
- 1 Gambia 1 compare
- 1 Georgia 1 compare
- 1 Germany 1 compare
- 1 Greece 1 compare
- 1 Guinea 1 compare
- 1 Honduras 1 compare
- 1 Hong Kong 1 compare
- 1 Hungary 1 compare
- 1 Iceland 1 compare
- 1 India 1 compare
- 1 Indonesia 1 compare
- 1 Iran 1 compare
- 1 Iraq 1 compare
- 1 Ireland 1 compare
- 1 Israel 1 compare
- 1 Italy 1 compare
- 1 Japan 1 compare
- 1 Jordan 1 compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 1 compare
- 1 South Korea 1 compare
- 1 Kuwait 1 compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 1 compare
- 1 Latvia 1 compare
- 1 Liberia 1 compare
- 1 Libya 1 compare
- 1 Liechtenstein 1 compare
- 1 Lithuania 1 compare
- 1 Luxembourg 1 compare
- 1 Macao 1 compare
- 1 Madagascar 1 compare
- 1 Maldives 1 compare
- 1 Mali 1 compare
- 1 Malta 1 compare
- 1 Mauritania 1 compare
- 1 Mauritius 1 compare
- 1 Mexico 1 compare
- 1 Moldova 1 compare
- 1 Mongolia 1 compare
- 1 Nauru 1 compare
- 1 Nepal 1 compare
- 1 Netherlands 1 compare
- 1 New Caledonia 1 compare
- 1 New Zealand 1 compare
- 1 Niger 1 compare
- 1 North Macedonia 1 compare
- 1 Northern Mariana Islands 1 compare
- 1 Norway 1 compare
- 1 Oman 1 compare
- 1 Pakistan 1 compare
- 1 Palau 1 compare
- 1 Panama 1 compare
- 1 Paraguay 1 compare
- 1 Philippines 1 compare
- 1 Poland 1 compare
- 1 Portugal 1 compare
- 1 Puerto Rico 1 compare
- 1 Qatar 1 compare
- 1 Romania 1 compare
- 1 Russia 1 compare
- 1 Samoa 1 compare
- 1 Sao Tome and Principe 1 compare
- 1 Saudi Arabia 1 compare
- 1 Senegal 1 compare
- 1 Serbia 1 compare
- 1 Singapore 1 compare
- 1 Slovakia 1 compare
- 1 Slovenia 1 compare
- 1 South Africa 1 compare
- 1 South Sudan 1 compare
- 1 Spain 1 compare
- 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 compare
- 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1 compare
- 1 Sudan 1 compare
- 1 Suriname 1 compare
- 1 Sweden 1 compare
- 1 Switzerland 1 compare
- 1 Tajikistan 1 compare
- 1 Tanzania 1 compare
- 1 Thailand 1 compare
- 1 East Timor 1 compare
- 1 Togo 1 compare
- 1 Tonga 1 compare
- 1 Turkey 1 compare
- 1 Uganda 1 compare
- 1 Ukraine 1 compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 1 compare
- 1 United Kingdom 1 compare
- 1 United States 1 compare
- 1 Uruguay 1 compare
- 1 Uzbekistan 1 compare
- 1 Vanuatu 1 compare
- 1 Palestine 1 compare
More reference data data for Botswana
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 41.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0825 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.003 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 1,922 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 11.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.8077 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 1,899 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0424 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 5.1: legislation and governance in Botswana?
- Dimension 5.1: legislation and governance in Botswana was 1 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 5.1: legislation and governance recorded in Botswana?
- The highest recorded value was 1 in 2019.
- What is the lowest dimension 5.1: legislation and governance recorded in Botswana?
- The lowest recorded value was 1 in 2019.
- How does Botswana rank for dimension 5.1: legislation and governance?
- Botswana ranks 1st out of 151 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this Botswana data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Included in dashboard, but not index because of insufficient country coverage. This indicator is based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 (national statistical legislation compliance with UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics), existence of National Statistical Council, national statistical strategy generation, national statistical plan. Limited country coverage makes cross country comparison limited. A global database of statistical and data legislation and governance practice would be a valuable resource for capacity building in general not just for the SPI.