Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Finland

Finland: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data was 0.593 in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
0.593
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
6th
of 180 countries
All-time high
0.593
in 2022
All-time low
0.351
in 2017
Years of data
8
2016–2023

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Finland, 2016–2023

00.20.40.62016201920232016: 0.512017: 0.3512018: 0.4282019: 0.4282020: 0.562021: 0.562022: 0.5932023: 0.593

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).

Analysis

The most recent figure for dimension 4.3: geospatial data in Finland is 0.593, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 8 years on record.

The figure is up 16.3% over ten years.

Finland ranks 6th of 180 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Finland, year by year

Annual values for Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Finland, 2016 to 2023.
Year Value Change
2016 0.51
2017 0.351 -31.2%
2018 0.428 +21.9%
2019 0.428 +0.0%
2020 0.56 +30.8%
2021 0.56 +0.0%
2022 0.593 +5.9%
2023 0.593 +0.0%

Finland compared with similar countries

  • Finland's 0.593 is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.334, 1.8× the median. (57 countries reporting)
  • Finland's 0.593 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.298, 2.0× the median. (50 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 0.4293 0.351 0.51 4
2020s 0.5765 0.56 0.593 4

Countries ranked near Finland

  1. 3 Poland 0.657 compare
  2. 4 Sri Lanka 0.619 compare
  3. 5 Sierra Leone 0.604 compare
  4. 6 Canada 0.593 compare
  5. 8 Norway 0.554 compare
  6. 9 Denmark 0.55 compare

See the full ranking of 180 places →

More reference data data for Finland

All data for Finland →

Frequently asked questions

What is dimension 4.3: geospatial data in Finland?
Dimension 4.3: geospatial data in Finland was 0.593 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
What is the highest dimension 4.3: geospatial data recorded in Finland?
The highest recorded value was 0.593 in 2022.
What is the lowest dimension 4.3: geospatial data recorded in Finland?
The lowest recorded value was 0.351 in 2017.
How does Finland rank for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Finland ranks 6th out of 180 countries with data for 2023.
Is dimension 4.3: geospatial data rising or falling in Finland?
Over the last ten years it is up 16.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Finland data come from?
The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Finland. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/dimension-4-3-geospatial-data/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/dimension-4-3-geospatial-data/finland/">Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Finland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
180 places, 1,560 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.