Finland vs Poland: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time
- Finland
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0.657 against 0.593 in Finland, a difference of 0.064.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 6th and Poland ranks 3rd of 177 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4293 | 0.603 | 0.1737 | Poland |
| 2020s | 0.5765 | 0.625 | 0.0485 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Finland or Poland?
- Poland, at 0.657 against 0.593 in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Finland and Poland?
- 0.064, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Poland rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
- Finland ranks 6th and Poland ranks 3rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.