Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Austria

Austria: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data was 0.304 in 2023. ▬ Flat

Latest (2023)
0.304
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
72nd
of 180 countries
All-time high
0.324
in 2018
All-time low
0.232
in 2020
Years of data
8
2016–2023

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Austria, 2016–2023

00.10.20.32016201920232016: 0.2762017: 0.2572018: 0.3242019: 0.3242020: 0.2322021: 0.2322022: 0.3042023: 0.304

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).

Analysis

Austria recorded 0.304 for dimension 4.3: geospatial data in 2023.

That represents a change of up 10.1% over ten years.

Austria ranks 72nd of 180 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Austria, year by year

Annual values for Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Austria, 2016 to 2023.
Year Value Change
2016 0.276 —
2017 0.257 -6.9%
2018 0.324 +26.1%
2019 0.324 +0.0%
2020 0.232 -28.4%
2021 0.232 +0.0%
2022 0.304 +31.0%
2023 0.304 +0.0%

Austria compared with similar countries

  • Austria's 0.304 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.334, 91% of the median. (57 countries reporting)
  • Austria's 0.304 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.298, 1.0× the median. (50 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 0.2953 0.257 0.324 4
2020s 0.268 0.232 0.304 4

Countries ranked near Austria

  1. 69 Dominican Republic 0.313 compare
  2. 69 Greece 0.313 compare
  3. 69 Russia 0.313 compare
  4. 72 Cameroon 0.304 compare
  5. 72 Georgia 0.304 compare
  6. 72 Mali 0.304 compare
  7. 72 Vietnam 0.304 compare

See the full ranking of 180 places →

More reference data data for Austria

All data for Austria →

Frequently asked questions

What is dimension 4.3: geospatial data in Austria?
Dimension 4.3: geospatial data in Austria was 0.304 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
What is the highest dimension 4.3: geospatial data recorded in Austria?
The highest recorded value was 0.324 in 2018.
What is the lowest dimension 4.3: geospatial data recorded in Austria?
The lowest recorded value was 0.232 in 2020.
How does Austria rank for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Austria ranks 72nd out of 180 countries with data for 2023.
Is dimension 4.3: geospatial data rising or falling in Austria?
Over the last ten years it is up 10.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Austria data come from?
The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Austria. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/dimension-4-3-geospatial-data/austria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/dimension-4-3-geospatial-data/austria/">Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Austria</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
180 places, 1,560 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.