Austria vs Cameroon: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Austria
0.304
in 2023
Cameroon
0.304
in 2023
Austria rank
72nd
Cameroon rank
72nd

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Austria
  • Cameroon
00.10.20.30.4201520192023

How they compare

Austria currently reports 0.304 against 0.304 in Cameroon, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 72nd and Cameroon ranks 72nd of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Cameroon in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Cameroon Difference Ahead
2010s 0.2953 0.2732 0.022 Austria
2020s 0.268 0.3355 0.0675 Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Austria or Cameroon?
Austria, at 0.304 against 0.304 in Cameroon as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Austria and Cameroon?
0, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Cameroon?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Austria and Cameroon rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Austria ranks 72nd and Cameroon ranks 72nd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.