Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data in Samoa
Samoa: Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data was 0.5 in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data in Samoa, 2004–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
In 2023, dimension 4.2: administrative data in Samoa stood at 0.5. That is the highest value across all 20 years on record.
Over the whole period, dimension 4.2: administrative data in Samoa peaked at 0.5 in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0, in 2004.
Samoa ranks 131st of 218 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data in Samoa, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 0 | — |
| 2005 | 0 | — |
| 2006 | 0 | — |
| 2007 | 0 | — |
| 2008 | 0 | — |
| 2009 | 0 | — |
| 2010 | 0 | — |
| 2011 | 0 | — |
| 2012 | 0 | — |
| 2013 | 0 | — |
| 2014 | 0 | — |
| 2015 | 0 | — |
| 2016 | 0 | — |
| 2017 | 0 | — |
| 2018 | 0 | — |
| 2019 | 0 | — |
| 2020 | 0.5 | — |
| 2021 | 0.5 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.5 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.5 | +0.0% |
Samoa compared with similar countries
- Samoa's 0.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1, 50% of the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Samoa's 0.5 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.5, 1.0× the median. (37 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Samoa
- 131 Bahamas 0.5 compare
- 131 Bangladesh 0.5 compare
- 131 Bolivia 0.5 compare
- 131 Ecuador 0.5 compare
- 131 Fiji 0.5 compare
- 131 Guyana 0.5 compare
- 131 Iraq 0.5 compare
- 131 Jordan 0.5 compare
- 131 Paraguay 0.5 compare
- 131 Tajikistan 0.5 compare
- 131 Thailand 0.5 compare
- 131 Venezuela 0.5 compare
- 131 Palestine 0.5 compare
More reference data data for Samoa
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.023 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0165 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0396 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0396 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.077 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0626 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0918 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2319 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.1693 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 4.2: administrative data in Samoa?
- Dimension 4.2: administrative data in Samoa was 0.5 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 4.2: administrative data recorded in Samoa?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5 in 2020.
- What is the lowest dimension 4.2: administrative data recorded in Samoa?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2004.
- How does Samoa rank for dimension 4.2: administrative data?
- Samoa ranks 131st out of 218 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this Samoa data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Average score for CRVS indicator. An ideal indicator would include a score based on the density of administrative data available in sectors of social protection, education, labor, and health. However, social protection, education, health, and labor admin data indicators not included because of lack of established methodology. While our team identified several promising sources for administrative data from the World Bank's ASPIRE team, WHO, UNESCO, and ILO, incomplete coverage across countries made us drop these indicators from our index. A major research and data collection effort is needed from all custodian agencies to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of administrative data availability can be produced.