Iraq vs Samoa: Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data

Iraq
0.5
in 2023
Samoa
0.5
in 2023
Iraq rank
130th
Samoa rank
130th

Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data over time

  • Iraq
  • Samoa
00.10.20.30.40.5200420132023

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 0.5 against 0.5 in Samoa, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Samoa ahead.

Iraq ranks 130th and Samoa ranks 130th of 214 countries.

Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 0 0 0
2010s 0.05 0 0.05 Iraq
2020s 0.5 0.5 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.2: administrative data, Iraq or Samoa?
Iraq, at 0.5 against 0.5 in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.2: administrative data between Iraq and Samoa?
0, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Samoa?
20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do Iraq and Samoa rank globally for dimension 4.2: administrative data?
Iraq ranks 130th and Samoa ranks 130th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 4,340 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Average score for CRVS indicator. An ideal indicator would include a score based on the density of administrative data available in sectors of social protection, education, labor, and health. However, social protection, education, health, and labor admin data indicators not included because of lack of established methodology. While our team identified several promising sources for administrative data from the World Bank's ASPIRE team, WHO, UNESCO, and ILO, incomplete coverage across countries made us drop these indicators from our index. A major research and data collection effort is needed from all custodian agencies to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of administrative data availability can be produced.