Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score in Tunisia
Tunisia: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score was 0.467 in 2023. ▼ Falling
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score in Tunisia, 2015–2023
Source: Open Data Watch.
Analysis
In 2023, dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score in Tunisia stood at 0.467.
The figure is down 47.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score in Tunisia peaked at 0.883 in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0.188, in 2016.
Tunisia ranks 103rd of 180 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 0.883 | — |
| 2016 | 0.188 | -78.7% |
| 2017 | 0.374 | +98.9% |
| 2018 | 0.43 | +15.0% |
| 2019 | 0.43 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.507 | +17.9% |
| 2021 | 0.507 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.467 | -7.9% |
| 2023 | 0.467 | +0.0% |
Tunisia compared with similar countries
- Tunisia's 0.467 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.4465, 1.0× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Tunisia's 0.467 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0.45, 1.0× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.461 | 0.188 | 0.883 | 5 |
| 2020s | 0.487 | 0.467 | 0.507 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
- 100 South Korea 0.476 compare
- 100 Sri Lanka 0.476 compare
- 102 Kazakhstan 0.474 compare
- 103 Belgium 0.467 compare
- 103 Benin 0.467 compare
- 103 Burkina Faso 0.467 compare
- 103 Costa Rica 0.467 compare
- 103 Ecuador 0.467 compare
- 103 Japan 0.467 compare
- 103 Kosovo 0.467 compare
- 103 Mali 0.467 compare
- 103 Myanmar 0.467 compare
- 103 Niger 0.467 compare
- 103 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 0.467 compare
More reference data data for Tunisia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.148 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1317 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4961 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1849 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7169 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score in Tunisia?
- Dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score in Tunisia was 0.467 in 2023, according to Open Data Watch.
- What is the highest dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.883 in 2015.
- What is the lowest dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.188 in 2016.
- How does Tunisia rank for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Tunisia ranks 103rd out of 180 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 47.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from Open Data Watch, published as part of Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.