Kazakhstan vs Tunisia: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score

Kazakhstan
0.474
in 2023
Tunisia
0.467
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
102nd
Tunisia rank
103rd

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Tunisia
0.20.40.60.8201520192023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0.474 against 0.467 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.007.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Tunisia ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 102nd and Tunisia ranks 103rd of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Tunisia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.5242 0.461 0.0632 Kazakhstan
2020s 0.4785 0.487 0.0085 Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Kazakhstan or Tunisia?
Kazakhstan, at 0.474 against 0.467 in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Kazakhstan and Tunisia?
0.007, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Tunisia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Tunisia rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
Kazakhstan ranks 102nd and Tunisia ranks 103rd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.