Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in New Caledonia

New Caledonia: Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations was 0.6 in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0.6
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
148th
of 214 countries
All-time high
0.6
in 2017
All-time low
0
in 2004
Years of data
20
2004–2023

Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in New Caledonia, 2004–2023

00.20.40.62004201320232004: 02005: 02006: 02007: 02008: 02009: 02010: 02011: 02012: 02013: 02014: 0.12015: 0.32016: 0.52017: 0.62018: 0.62019: 0.62020: 0.62021: 0.62022: 0.62023: 0.6

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).

Analysis

The most recent figure for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in New Caledonia is 0.6, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 20 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

Over the whole period, dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in New Caledonia peaked at 0.6 in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0, in 2004.

That places New Caledonia 148th out of 214 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0 0 0 6
2010s 0.27 0 0.6 10
2020s 0.6 0.6 0.6 4

Countries ranked near New Caledonia

  1. 145 Afghanistan 0.666 compare
  2. 145 Guinea 0.666 compare
  3. 145 Iran 0.666 compare
  4. 148 Andorra 0.6 compare
  5. 148 Antigua and Barbuda 0.6 compare
  6. 148 Bahamas 0.6 compare
  7. 148 Bahrain 0.6 compare
  8. 148 Cameroon 0.6 compare
  9. 148 Comoros 0.6 compare
  10. 148 Curacao 0.6 compare
  11. 148 Dominica 0.6 compare
  12. 148 Fiji 0.6 compare
  13. 148 Gabon 0.6 compare
  14. 148 Hong Kong 0.6 compare
  15. 148 Kuwait 0.6 compare
  16. 148 Lebanon 0.6 compare
  17. 148 Madagascar 0.6 compare
  18. 148 Monaco 0.6 compare
  19. 148 Namibia 0.6 compare
  20. 148 Nicaragua 0.6 compare
  21. 148 Papua New Guinea 0.6 compare
  22. 148 Sao Tome and Principe 0.6 compare
  23. 148 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.6 compare
  24. 148 Tajikistan 0.6 compare
  25. 148 Trinidad and Tobago 0.6 compare
  26. 148 Turkmenistan 0.6 compare
  27. 148 Venezuela 0.6 compare

See the full ranking of 217 places →

More reference data data for New Caledonia

All data for New Caledonia →

Frequently asked questions

What is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in New Caledonia?
Dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in New Caledonia was 0.6 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
What is the highest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in New Caledonia?
The highest recorded value was 0.6 in 2017.
What is the lowest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in New Caledonia?
The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2004.
How does New Caledonia rank for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations?
New Caledonia ranks 148th out of 214 countries with data for 2023.
Where does this New Caledonia data come from?
The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 4,340 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Five measures usefulness or reliability of country produced measures for international organizations. First, on comparability of poverty estimates for the World Bank reporting on international poverty (Source: Povcalnet). Second on usable surveys for statistics on child mortality for the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (Source: https://childmortality.org/). Third on accuracy of debt reporting as classified by the World Bank (Source: World Bank WDI metadata). Fourth, on availability of safely managed drinking water data for use by JMP. Fifth, on labor force participation data for use by ILO. We recognize that these data sources provide only partial coverage but consider that they do at least provide some indication of the performance of the national statistical system. With more complete data sources it would be possible to assess this further