Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Afghanistan

Afghanistan: Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations was 0.666 in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0.666
Change on year
down 16.8%
World rank
145th
of 218 countries
All-time high
0.8
in 2020
All-time low
0.2
in 2004
Years of data
20
2004–2023

Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Afghanistan, 2004–2023

0.20.40.60.82004201320232004: 0.22005: 0.22006: 0.22007: 0.22008: 0.22009: 0.22010: 0.22011: 0.22012: 0.32013: 0.32014: 0.32015: 0.52016: 0.72017: 0.72018: 0.72019: 0.72020: 0.82021: 0.82022: 0.82023: 0.666

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).

Analysis

The most recent figure for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Afghanistan is 0.666, measured in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 16.8% on the previous year and up 122.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Afghanistan peaked at 0.8 in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.2, in 2004.

That places Afghanistan 145th out of 218 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Afghanistan, year by year

Annual values for Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Afghanistan, 2004 to 2023.
Year Value Change
2004 0.2 —
2005 0.2 +0.0%
2006 0.2 +0.0%
2007 0.2 +0.0%
2008 0.2 +0.0%
2009 0.2 +0.0%
2010 0.2 +0.0%
2011 0.2 +0.0%
2012 0.3 +50.0%
2013 0.3 +0.0%
2014 0.3 +0.0%
2015 0.5 +66.7%
2016 0.7 +40.0%
2017 0.7 +0.0%
2018 0.7 +0.0%
2019 0.7 +0.0%
2020 0.8 +14.3%
2021 0.8 +0.0%
2022 0.8 +0.0%
2023 0.666 -16.8%

Afghanistan compared with similar countries

  • Afghanistan's 0.666 is below the median for low income countries, which is 0.8, 83% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
  • Afghanistan's 0.666 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0.8, 83% of the median. (23 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.2 0.2 0.2 6
2010s 0.46 0.2 0.7 10
2020s 0.7665 0.666 0.8 4

Countries ranked near Afghanistan

  1. 145 Guinea 0.666 compare
  2. 145 Iran 0.666 compare
  3. 148 Andorra 0.6 compare
  4. 148 Antigua and Barbuda 0.6 compare
  5. 148 Bahamas 0.6 compare
  6. 148 Bahrain 0.6 compare
  7. 148 Cameroon 0.6 compare
  8. 148 Comoros 0.6 compare
  9. 148 Curacao 0.6 compare
  10. 148 Dominica 0.6 compare
  11. 148 Fiji 0.6 compare
  12. 148 Gabon 0.6 compare
  13. 148 Hong Kong 0.6 compare
  14. 148 Kosovo 0.6 compare
  15. 148 Kuwait 0.6 compare
  16. 148 Lebanon 0.6 compare
  17. 148 Madagascar 0.6 compare
  18. 148 Monaco 0.6 compare
  19. 148 Namibia 0.6 compare
  20. 148 New Caledonia 0.6 compare
  21. 148 Nicaragua 0.6 compare
  22. 148 Papua New Guinea 0.6 compare
  23. 148 Sao Tome and Principe 0.6 compare
  24. 148 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.6 compare
  25. 148 Tajikistan 0.6 compare
  26. 148 Trinidad and Tobago 0.6 compare
  27. 148 Turkmenistan 0.6 compare
  28. 148 Venezuela 0.6 compare
  29. 148 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 0.6 compare

See the full ranking of 219 places →

More reference data data for Afghanistan

All data for Afghanistan →

Frequently asked questions

What is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Afghanistan?
Dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Afghanistan was 0.666 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
What is the highest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Afghanistan?
The highest recorded value was 0.8 in 2020.
What is the lowest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Afghanistan?
The lowest recorded value was 0.2 in 2004.
How does Afghanistan rank for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations?
Afghanistan ranks 145th out of 218 countries with data for 2023.
Is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations rising or falling in Afghanistan?
Over the last ten years it is up 122.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Afghanistan data come from?
The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Afghanistan. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/dimension-1-5-data-use-by-international-organizations/afghanistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/dimension-1-5-data-use-by-international-organizations/afghanistan/">Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Afghanistan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 4,380 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Five measures usefulness or reliability of country produced measures for international organizations. First, on comparability of poverty estimates for the World Bank reporting on international poverty (Source: Povcalnet). Second on usable surveys for statistics on child mortality for the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (Source: https://childmortality.org/). Third on accuracy of debt reporting as classified by the World Bank (Source: World Bank WDI metadata). Fourth, on availability of safely managed drinking water data for use by JMP. Fifth, on labor force participation data for use by ILO. We recognize that these data sources provide only partial coverage but consider that they do at least provide some indication of the performance of the national statistical system. With more complete data sources it would be possible to assess this further