Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Kiribati

Kiribati: Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations was 0.5 in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
0.5
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
174th
of 214 countries
All-time high
0.5
in 2015
All-time low
0.2
in 2004
Years of data
20
2004–2023

Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Kiribati, 2004–2023

00.10.20.30.40.52004201320232004: 0.22005: 0.22006: 0.22007: 0.22008: 0.22009: 0.22010: 0.32011: 0.32012: 0.32013: 0.32014: 0.32015: 0.52016: 0.52017: 0.42018: 0.42019: 0.42020: 0.52021: 0.52022: 0.52023: 0.5

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).

Analysis

The most recent figure for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Kiribati is 0.5, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 20 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 66.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Kiribati peaked at 0.5 in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0.2, in 2004.

That places Kiribati 174th out of 214 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 20 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.2 0.2 0.2 6
2010s 0.37 0.3 0.5 10
2020s 0.5 0.5 0.5 4

Countries ranked near Kiribati

  1. 173 Vanuatu 0.566 compare
  2. 174 Botswana 0.5 compare
  3. 174 Central African Republic 0.5 compare
  4. 174 Congo 0.5 compare
  5. 174 Haiti 0.5 compare
  6. 174 Liechtenstein 0.5 compare
  7. 174 Macao 0.5 compare
  8. 174 Nauru 0.5 compare
  9. 174 Palau 0.5 compare
  10. 174 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.5 compare
  11. 174 Tuvalu 0.5 compare

See the full ranking of 217 places →

More reference data data for Kiribati

All data for Kiribati →

Frequently asked questions

What is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Kiribati?
Dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Kiribati was 0.5 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
What is the highest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Kiribati?
The highest recorded value was 0.5 in 2015.
What is the lowest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Kiribati?
The lowest recorded value was 0.2 in 2004.
How does Kiribati rank for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations?
Kiribati ranks 174th out of 214 countries with data for 2023.
Is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations rising or falling in Kiribati?
Over the last ten years it is up 66.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Kiribati data come from?
The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 4,340 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Five measures usefulness or reliability of country produced measures for international organizations. First, on comparability of poverty estimates for the World Bank reporting on international poverty (Source: Povcalnet). Second on usable surveys for statistics on child mortality for the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (Source: https://childmortality.org/). Third on accuracy of debt reporting as classified by the World Bank (Source: World Bank WDI metadata). Fourth, on availability of safely managed drinking water data for use by JMP. Fifth, on labor force participation data for use by ILO. We recognize that these data sources provide only partial coverage but consider that they do at least provide some indication of the performance of the national statistical system. With more complete data sources it would be possible to assess this further