Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Botswana
Botswana: Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations was 0.5 in 2023. ▲ Rising
Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Botswana, 2004–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
Botswana recorded 0.5 for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in 2023.
That represents a change of up 25.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Botswana peaked at 0.6 in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0.2, in 2004.
Botswana ranks 174th of 214 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 20 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2167 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 6 |
| 2010s | 0.4966 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.525 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Botswana
- 173 Vanuatu 0.566 compare
- 174 Central African Republic 0.5 compare
- 174 Congo 0.5 compare
- 174 Haiti 0.5 compare
- 174 Kiribati 0.5 compare
- 174 Liechtenstein 0.5 compare
- 174 Macao 0.5 compare
- 174 Nauru 0.5 compare
- 174 Palau 0.5 compare
- 174 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.5 compare
- 174 Tuvalu 0.5 compare
More reference data data for Botswana
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 41.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0825 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.003 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 1,922 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 11.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.8077 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 1,899 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0424 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Botswana?
- Dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Botswana was 0.5 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Botswana?
- The highest recorded value was 0.6 in 2015.
- What is the lowest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Botswana?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2 in 2004.
- How does Botswana rank for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations?
- Botswana ranks 174th out of 214 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations rising or falling in Botswana?
- Over the last ten years it is up 25.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Botswana data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Five measures usefulness or reliability of country produced measures for international organizations. First, on comparability of poverty estimates for the World Bank reporting on international poverty (Source: Povcalnet). Second on usable surveys for statistics on child mortality for the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (Source: https://childmortality.org/). Third on accuracy of debt reporting as classified by the World Bank (Source: World Bank WDI metadata). Fourth, on availability of safely managed drinking water data for use by JMP. Fifth, on labor force participation data for use by ILO. We recognize that these data sources provide only partial coverage but consider that they do at least provide some indication of the performance of the national statistical system. With more complete data sources it would be possible to assess this further