The demographic transition in Sweden in Taiwan
Taiwan: The demographic transition in Sweden was 7.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010. ▼ Falling
Latest (2010)
7.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
down 13.3%
World rank
56th
of 56 countries
All-time high
50 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1951
All-time low
7.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2010
Years of data
102
1906–2010
The demographic transition in Sweden in Taiwan, 1906–2010
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
In 2010, the demographic transition in sweden in Taiwan stood at 7.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population). That is the lowest value across all 102 years on record.
That represents a change of down 13.3% on the previous year and down 47.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Taiwan peaked at 50 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1951 and was at its lowest, 7.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 2010.
Taiwan ranks 56th of 56 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 102 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Taiwan, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1906 | 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1907 | 39.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1908 | 38.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1909 | 40.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.2% |
| 1910 | 41.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1911 | 41.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1912 | 41.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1913 | 40.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1914 | 41.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.5% |
| 1915 | 40 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1916 | 37.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.8% |
| 1917 | 40.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.7% |
| 1918 | 39.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1919 | 38.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1920 | 39.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 1921 | 42.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.4% |
| 1922 | 41.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1923 | 39.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.5% |
| 1924 | 41.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.9% |
| 1925 | 40.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1926 | 43.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.1% |
| 1927 | 43.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1928 | 43.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1929 | 44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1930 | 44.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 1931 | 45.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1932 | 44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1933 | 44.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1934 | 44.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1935 | 44.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1936 | 43.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1937 | 44.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.0% |
| 1938 | 43.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1939 | 43.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1940 | 43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1941 | 41.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1942 | 40.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1943 | 40 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1947 | 38.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 1948 | 39.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.7% |
| 1949 | 42.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.8% |
| 1950 | 43.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 1951 | 50 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +15.2% |
| 1952 | 46.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.8% |
| 1953 | 45.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1954 | 44.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1955 | 45.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1956 | 44.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1957 | 41.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.6% |
| 1958 | 41.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1959 | 41.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1960 | 39.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1961 | 38.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1962 | 37.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1963 | 36.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1964 | 34.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.0% |
| 1965 | 32.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.2% |
| 1966 | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1967 | 28.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -12.0% |
| 1968 | 29.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1969 | 27.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.8% |
| 1970 | 27.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1971 | 25.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.9% |
| 1972 | 24.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 1973 | 23.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1974 | 23.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1975 | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1976 | 25.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +12.6% |
| 1977 | 23.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.1% |
| 1978 | 24.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1979 | 24.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1980 | 23.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1981 | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1982 | 22.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1983 | 20.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.8% |
| 1984 | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.9% |
| 1985 | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.2% |
| 1986 | 15.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.7% |
| 1987 | 16 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1988 | 17.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.5% |
| 1989 | 15.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.7% |
| 1990 | 16.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.7% |
| 1991 | 15.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.4% |
| 1992 | 15.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1993 | 15.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1994 | 15.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1995 | 15.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1996 | 15.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1997 | 15.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1998 | 12.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -17.9% |
| 1999 | 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.0% |
| 2000 | 13.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.0% |
| 2001 | 11.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -15.2% |
| 2002 | 11 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.0% |
| 2003 | 10 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.1% |
| 2004 | 9.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.0% |
| 2005 | 9.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.2% |
| 2006 | 9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 2007 | 9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 8.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 2009 | 8.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 2010 | 7.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -13.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 39.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 40.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 4 |
| 1910s | 40.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 41.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 39.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 44.35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 43.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 45.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 40.69 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 7 |
| 1950s | 44.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 41.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 50 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 33.68 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 39.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 24.54 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 19.15 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 15.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 14.98 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2000s | 10.01 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 8.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2010s | 7.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 7.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 7.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1 |
Countries ranked near Taiwan
More reference data data for Taiwan
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 2,323 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 111.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 46.04 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0594 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4506 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.6 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on 360.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural 2,013 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Taiwan?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Taiwan was 7.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Taiwan?
- The highest recorded value was 50 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1951.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Taiwan?
- The lowest recorded value was 7.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010.
- How does Taiwan rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Taiwan ranks 56th out of 56 countries with data for 2010.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Taiwan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 47.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Taiwan data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 102 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.