The demographic transition in Sweden in Singapore
Singapore: The demographic transition in Sweden was 7.93 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2009. ▼ Falling
Latest (2009)
7.93 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
down 3.6%
World rank
55th
of 56 countries
All-time high
47.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1939
All-time low
7.93 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2009
Years of data
104
1900–2009
The demographic transition in Sweden in Singapore, 1900–2009
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
The most recent figure for the demographic transition in sweden in Singapore is 7.93 per 1,000 (in the entire population), measured in 2009. That is the lowest value across all 104 years on record.
The figure is down 3.6% on the previous year and down 27.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Singapore peaked at 47.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1939 and was at its lowest, 7.93 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 2009.
Singapore ranks 55th of 56 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 104 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Singapore, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1900 | 25.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1901 | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1902 | 26.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.2% |
| 1903 | 25.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1904 | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +11.7% |
| 1906 | 25.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.9% |
| 1907 | 25.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.0% |
| 1908 | 28.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.5% |
| 1909 | 26.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.0% |
| 1910 | 25.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.5% |
| 1911 | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1912 | 28 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +12.0% |
| 1913 | 27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1914 | 29.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.8% |
| 1915 | 29.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1916 | 28.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1917 | 30.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.9% |
| 1918 | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.8% |
| 1919 | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.9% |
| 1920 | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1921 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.1% |
| 1922 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.4% |
| 1923 | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1924 | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.9% |
| 1925 | 31.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1926 | 32.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.5% |
| 1927 | 35.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.7% |
| 1928 | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 1929 | 37.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1930 | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1931 | 36.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1932 | 35.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1933 | 41.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +17.0% |
| 1934 | 43.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1935 | 45.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.4% |
| 1936 | 46.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1937 | 45.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1938 | 44.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1939 | 47.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.0% |
| 1940 | 45 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 1941 | 44.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1947 | 45.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1948 | 46.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1949 | 47.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1950 | 45.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1951 | 46.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1952 | 45.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1953 | 45.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1954 | 45.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.2% |
| 1955 | 44.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1956 | 44.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.2% |
| 1957 | 43.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1958 | 41.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1959 | 40.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 1960 | 38.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 1961 | 36.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.7% |
| 1962 | 34.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1963 | 34.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1964 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1965 | 30.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.4% |
| 1966 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1967 | 26.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.0% |
| 1968 | 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.9% |
| 1969 | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.9% |
| 1970 | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1971 | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1972 | 23.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1973 | 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.1% |
| 1974 | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.7% |
| 1975 | 17.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.7% |
| 1976 | 18.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.6% |
| 1977 | 16.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.8% |
| 1978 | 16.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 1979 | 17.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 1980 | 17.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 17.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1982 | 17.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 16.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.4% |
| 1984 | 16.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1985 | 16.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1986 | 14.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.8% |
| 1987 | 16.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +12.8% |
| 1988 | 20 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +19.8% |
| 1989 | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.0% |
| 1990 | 18.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.0% |
| 1991 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.8% |
| 1992 | 17.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1993 | 17.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 14.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -16.0% |
| 1995 | 14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.8% |
| 1996 | 13.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 1997 | 12.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.2% |
| 1998 | 11.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.0% |
| 1999 | 11 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 2000 | 11.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.4% |
| 2001 | 10 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.5% |
| 2002 | 9.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 2003 | 9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.2% |
| 2004 | 10.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +21.1% |
| 2005 | 10.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 2006 | 8.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -19.4% |
| 2007 | 8.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 2008 | 8.23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 2009 | 7.93 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
Singapore compared with similar countries
- Singapore's 7.93 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for high income countries, which is 11.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 68% of the median. (34 countries reporting)
- Singapore's 7.93 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 13.47 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 59% of the median. (7 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 26.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 1910s | 28.14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 32.86 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 42.35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 47.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 45.78 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 44.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 47.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 5 |
| 1950s | 44.28 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 40.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 46.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 31.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 19.77 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 17.04 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 14.88 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2000s | 9.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 7.93 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
Countries ranked near Singapore
More reference data data for Singapore
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.008 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0066 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0618 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0618 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0269 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0096 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0378 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2664 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0 (1992)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.2567 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Singapore?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Singapore was 7.93 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2009, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Singapore?
- The highest recorded value was 47.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1939.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Singapore?
- The lowest recorded value was 7.93 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2009.
- How does Singapore rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Singapore ranks 55th out of 56 countries with data for 2009.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Singapore?
- Over the last ten years it is down 27.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Singapore data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 104 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.