Meaningful democratic electoral institutions in Belarus
Belarus: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions was 0 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions in Belarus, 1795–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 0 for meaningful democratic electoral institutions in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 231 years on record.
Over the whole period, meaningful democratic electoral institutions in Belarus peaked at 1 in 1992 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1795.
Belarus ranks 87th of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1790s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 1800s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.4 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 87 Afghanistan 0 compare
- 87 Albania 0 compare
- 87 Algeria 0 compare
- 87 Angola 0 compare
- 87 Azerbaijan 0 compare
- 87 Bahrain 0 compare
- 87 Bangladesh 0 compare
- 87 Benin 0 compare
- 87 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 compare
- 87 Burkina Faso 0 compare
- 87 Burundi 0 compare
- 87 Cambodia 0 compare
- 87 Cameroon 0 compare
- 87 Central African Republic 0 compare
- 87 Chad 0 compare
- 87 China 0 compare
- 87 Comoros 0 compare
- 87 Congo 0 compare
- 87 Cote d'Ivoire 0 compare
- 87 Cuba 0 compare
- 87 Democratic Republic of Congo 0 compare
- 87 Djibouti 0 compare
- 87 Egypt 0 compare
- 87 El Salvador 0 compare
- 87 Equatorial Guinea 0 compare
- 87 Eritrea 0 compare
- 87 Eswatini 0 compare
- 87 Ethiopia 0 compare
- 87 Gabon 0 compare
- 87 Georgia 0 compare
- 87 Guinea 0 compare
- 87 Guinea-Bissau 0 compare
- 87 Haiti 0 compare
- 87 Hong Kong 0 compare
- 87 Hungary 0 compare
- 87 India 0 compare
- 87 Indonesia 0 compare
- 87 Iran 0 compare
- 87 Iraq 0 compare
- 87 Jordan 0 compare
- 87 Kazakhstan 0 compare
- 87 Kuwait 0 compare
- 87 Kyrgyzstan 0 compare
- 87 Laos 0 compare
- 87 Lebanon 0 compare
- 87 Libya 0 compare
- 87 Madagascar 0 compare
- 87 Mali 0 compare
- 87 Mauritania 0 compare
- 87 Mexico 0 compare
- 87 Morocco 0 compare
- 87 Mozambique 0 compare
- 87 Myanmar 0 compare
- 87 Nicaragua 0 compare
- 87 Niger 0 compare
- 87 North Korea 0 compare
- 87 Oman 0 compare
- 87 Pakistan 0 compare
- 87 Palestine 0 compare
- 87 Papua New Guinea 0 compare
- 87 Philippines 0 compare
- 87 Qatar 0 compare
- 87 Russia 0 compare
- 87 Rwanda 0 compare
- 87 Saudi Arabia 0 compare
- 87 Serbia 0 compare
- 87 Sierra Leone 0 compare
- 87 Singapore 0 compare
- 87 Somalia 0 compare
- 87 South Sudan 0 compare
- 87 Sudan 0 compare
- 87 Syria 0 compare
- 87 Tajikistan 0 compare
- 87 Tanzania 0 compare
- 87 Thailand 0 compare
- 87 Togo 0 compare
- 87 Tunisia 0 compare
- 87 Turkey 0 compare
- 87 Turkmenistan 0 compare
- 87 Uganda 0 compare
- 87 Ukraine 0 compare
- 87 United Arab Emirates 0 compare
- 87 Uzbekistan 0 compare
- 87 Vatican 0 compare
- 87 Venezuela 0 compare
- 87 Vietnam 0 compare
- 87 Yemen 0 compare
- 87 Zambia 0 compare
- 87 Zimbabwe 0 compare
More reference data data for Belarus
- Spring temperature anomalies 4.96 °C (2026)
- Summer temperature anomalies 1.14 °C (2026)
- Temperature anomalies by month -6.27 °C (2026)
- Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
- Autumn temperature anomalies 2.19 °C (2025)
- Winter temperature anomalies 2.92 °C (2025)
- Consumer price index 801.16 2010 = 100 (2025)
- Universal right to vote 2 (2025)
- Competitive elections 0 (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote 1 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is meaningful democratic electoral institutions in Belarus?
- Meaningful democratic electoral institutions in Belarus was 0 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest meaningful democratic electoral institutions recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 1 in 1992.
- What is the lowest meaningful democratic electoral institutions recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1795.
- How does Belarus rank for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Belarus ranks 87th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 231 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.