Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Peru

Peru: Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -urban was 24.6% in 2022. ▼ Falling

Latest (2022)
24.6%
Change on year
up 3.8%
World rank
13th
of 37 countries
All-time high
29.3%
in 2010
All-time low
22.9%
in 2020
Years of data
15
2008–2022

Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Peru, 2008–2022

01020302008201520222008: 29.32009: 29.12010: 29.32011: 27.42012: 252013: 242014: 23.52015: 22.92016: 23.12017: 24.42018: 23.82019: 25.52020: 22.92021: 23.72022: 24.6

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2022, coverage (%) - all private transfers -urban in Peru stood at 24.6%.

That represents a change of up 3.8% on the previous year and down 1.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, coverage (%) - all private transfers -urban in Peru peaked at 29.3% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 22.9%, in 2020.

Peru ranks 13th of 37 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.

Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Peru, year by year

Annual values for Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Peru, 2008 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2008 29.3% —
2009 29.1% -0.7%
2010 29.3% +0.9%
2011 27.4% -6.5%
2012 25.0% -8.8%
2013 24.0% -3.9%
2014 23.5% -2.0%
2015 22.9% -2.7%
2016 23.1% +0.8%
2017 24.4% +5.9%
2018 23.8% -2.7%
2019 25.5% +7.4%
2020 22.9% -10.4%
2021 23.7% +3.7%
2022 24.6% +3.8%

Peru compared with similar countries

  • Peru's 24.6% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 19.1%, 1.3× the median. (23 countries reporting)
  • Peru's 24.6% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 20.3%, 1.2× the median. (15 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 29.2% 29.1% 29.3% 2
2010s 24.9% 22.9% 29.3% 10
2020s 23.7% 22.9% 24.6% 3

Countries ranked near Peru

  1. 10 Cote d'Ivoire 30.5% compare
  2. 11 Moldova 28.6% compare
  3. 12 Burkina Faso 26.9% compare
  4. 14 Panama 24.0% compare
  5. 15 Thailand 23.6% compare
  6. 16 Armenia 22.9% compare

See the full ranking of 37 places →

More reference data data for Peru

All data for Peru →

Frequently asked questions

What is coverage (%) - all private transfers -urban in Peru?
Coverage (%) - all private transfers -urban in Peru was 24.6% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest coverage (%) - all private transfers -urban recorded in Peru?
The highest recorded value was 29.3% in 2010.
What is the lowest coverage (%) - all private transfers -urban recorded in Peru?
The lowest recorded value was 22.9% in 2020.
How does Peru rank for coverage (%) - all private transfers -urban?
Peru ranks 13th out of 37 countries with data for 2022.
Is coverage (%) - all private transfers -urban rising or falling in Peru?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Peru data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Peru. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/peru/">Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Peru</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
37 places, 361 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)