Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Peru

Peru: Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -rural was 14.9% in 2022. ▼ Falling

Latest (2022)
14.9%
Change on year
up 9.3%
World rank
26th
of 35 countries
All-time high
18.1%
in 2010
All-time low
10.9%
in 2020
Years of data
15
2008–2022

Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Peru, 2008–2022

051015202008201520222008: 17.82009: 17.32010: 18.12011: 162012: 13.62013: 12.42014: 12.42015: 11.62016: 11.32017: 11.42018: 13.62019: 14.62020: 10.92021: 13.62022: 14.9

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for coverage (%) - all private transfers -rural in Peru is 14.9%, measured in 2022.

That represents a change of up 9.3% on the previous year and up 9.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, coverage (%) - all private transfers -rural in Peru peaked at 18.1% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 10.9%, in 2020.

Peru ranks 26th of 35 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.

Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Peru, year by year

Annual values for Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Peru, 2008 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2008 17.8% —
2009 17.3% -2.4%
2010 18.1% +4.5%
2011 16.0% -11.3%
2012 13.6% -15.4%
2013 12.4% -8.6%
2014 12.4% -0.2%
2015 11.6% -6.4%
2016 11.3% -2.9%
2017 11.4% +1.6%
2018 13.6% +18.6%
2019 14.6% +7.3%
2020 10.9% -24.8%
2021 13.6% +24.4%
2022 14.9% +9.3%

Peru compared with similar countries

  • Peru's 14.9% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 21.1%, 71% of the median. (21 countries reporting)
  • Peru's 14.9% is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 23.5%, 63% of the median. (14 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 17.5% 17.3% 17.8% 2
2010s 13.5% 11.3% 18.1% 10
2020s 13.1% 10.9% 14.9% 3

Countries ranked near Peru

  1. 24 Sri Lanka 16.8% compare
  2. 25 Costa Rica 16.3% compare
  3. 27 Mongolia 13.6% compare
  4. 28 Chile 11.9% compare
  5. 29 Uruguay 10.1% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Peru

All data for Peru →

Frequently asked questions

What is coverage (%) - all private transfers -rural in Peru?
Coverage (%) - all private transfers -rural in Peru was 14.9% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest coverage (%) - all private transfers -rural recorded in Peru?
The highest recorded value was 18.1% in 2010.
What is the lowest coverage (%) - all private transfers -rural recorded in Peru?
The lowest recorded value was 10.9% in 2020.
How does Peru rank for coverage (%) - all private transfers -rural?
Peru ranks 26th out of 35 countries with data for 2022.
Is coverage (%) - all private transfers -rural rising or falling in Peru?
Over the last ten years it is up 9.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Peru data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Peru. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/peru/">Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Peru</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 336 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)