Control of Corruption in Libya
Libya: Control of Corruption was 0.1907 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Control of Corruption in Libya, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
In 2011, control of corruption in Libya stood at 0.1907 standard error.
The figure is up 2.4% on the previous year and down 35.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption in Libya peaked at 0.2959 standard error in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.1862 standard error, in 2010.
That places Libya 13th out of 53 countries with data for 2011, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Control of Corruption in Libya, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.2959 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.219 standard error | -26.0% |
| 2000 | 0.2952 standard error | +34.8% |
| 2002 | 0.2039 standard error | -30.9% |
| 2003 | 0.2301 standard error | +12.9% |
| 2004 | 0.233 standard error | +1.3% |
| 2005 | 0.2149 standard error | -7.8% |
| 2006 | 0.2415 standard error | +12.4% |
| 2007 | 0.2148 standard error | -11.0% |
| 2008 | 0.201 standard error | -6.4% |
| 2009 | 0.1886 standard error | -6.2% |
| 2010 | 0.1862 standard error | -1.3% |
| 2011 | 0.1907 standard error | +2.4% |
Libya compared with similar countries
- Libya's 0.1907 standard error is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.1842 standard error, 1.0× the median. (8 countries reporting)
- Libya's 0.1907 standard error is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0.1698 standard error, 1.1× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2574 standard error | 0.219 standard error | 0.2959 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.2248 standard error | 0.1886 standard error | 0.2952 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1885 standard error | 0.1862 standard error | 0.1907 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Libya
More reference data data for Libya
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0637 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.021 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2136 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0873 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1144 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption in Libya?
- Control of corruption in Libya was 0.1907 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest control of corruption recorded in Libya?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2959 standard error in 1996.
- What is the lowest control of corruption recorded in Libya?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1862 standard error in 2010.
- How does Libya rank for control of corruption?
- Libya ranks 13th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is control of corruption rising or falling in Libya?
- Over the last ten years it is down 35.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Libya data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Control of Corruption (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.CONT.CO.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.