Central African Republic vs Libya: Control of Corruption
Control of Corruption over time
- Central African Republic
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.1907 standard error against 0.1888 standard error in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0019 standard error.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 16th and Libya ranks 13th of 53 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4509 standard error | 0.2574 standard error | 0.1935 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | 0.257 standard error | 0.2248 standard error | 0.0322 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 0.1912 standard error | 0.1885 standard error | 0.0028 standard error | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption, Central African Republic or Libya?
- Libya, at 0.1907 standard error against 0.1888 standard error in Central African Republic as of 2011.
- What is the difference in control of corruption between Central African Republic and Libya?
- 0.0019 standard error, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Libya?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Central African Republic and Libya rank globally for control of corruption?
- Central African Republic ranks 16th and Libya ranks 13th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Control of Corruption (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.CONT.CO.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.