Kiribati vs Marshall Islands: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- Kiribati
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 0.3907 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0161 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 73rd and Marshall Islands ranks 71st of 204 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1869 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5918 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 0.2266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0128 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 0.3452 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0568 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Kiribati or Marshall Islands?
- Marshall Islands, at 0.3907 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Kiribati and Marshall Islands?
- 0.0161 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Marshall Islands?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Marshall Islands rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Kiribati ranks 73rd and Marshall Islands ranks 71st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.