Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Mali
Mali: Comparative advantage in environmental goods was 0.0957 index in 2017. ⲠRising
Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Mali, 1998â2017
Source: IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations. Measured in index.
Analysis
In 2017, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Mali stood at 0.0957 index. That is the highest value across all 16 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 58.2% on the previous year and up 153.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Mali peaked at 0.0957 index in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0.036 index, in 1999.
That places Mali 117th out of 163 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 16 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0423 index | 0.036 index | 0.0485 index | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.0562 index | 0.0372 index | 0.0756 index | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.0749 index | 0.055 index | 0.0957 index | 5 |
Countries ranked near Mali
More reference data data for Mali
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 11.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils 12,469 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation 21,260 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Crop Residues 580.67 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 30.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues 110.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 36.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 12,616 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 47.05 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is comparative advantage in environmental goods in Mali?
- Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Mali was 0.0957 index in 2017, according to IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations.
- What is the highest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Mali?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0957 index in 2017.
- What is the lowest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Mali?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.036 index in 1999.
- How does Mali rank for comparative advantage in environmental goods?
- Mali ranks 117th out of 163 countries with data for 2017.
- Is comparative advantage in environmental goods rising or falling in Mali?
- Over the last ten years it is up 153.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mali data come from?
- The figures come from IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations, published as part of Comparative advantage in environmental goods (index). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV ¡ JSON â 16 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â Comparative advantage is a measure of the relative advantage or disadvantage a particular country has in a certain class of goods (in this case, environmental goods), and can be used to evaluate export potential in that class of goods. Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â A value greater than one indicates a relative advantage in environmental goods, while a value of less than one indicates a relative disadvantage.