Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Ghana
Ghana: Comparative advantage in environmental goods was 0.0988 index in 2019. â Volatile
Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Ghana, 1998â2019
Source: IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations. Measured in index.
Analysis
In 2019, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Ghana stood at 0.0988 index.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 38.1% on the previous year and down 71.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Ghana peaked at 1.21 index in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.0343 index, in 1999.
That places Ghana 116th out of 163 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0857 index | 0.0343 index | 0.1372 index | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.3842 index | 0.1109 index | 1.21 index | 6 |
| 2010s | 0.2315 index | 0.0988 index | 0.5154 index | 10 |
Countries ranked near Ghana
More reference data data for Ghana
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2805 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1989 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9405 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9478 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 12.64 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.08 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is comparative advantage in environmental goods in Ghana?
- Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Ghana was 0.0988 index in 2019, according to IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations.
- What is the highest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Ghana?
- The highest recorded value was 1.21 index in 2006.
- What is the lowest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Ghana?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0343 index in 1999.
- How does Ghana rank for comparative advantage in environmental goods?
- Ghana ranks 116th out of 163 countries with data for 2019.
- Is comparative advantage in environmental goods rising or falling in Ghana?
- Over the last ten years it is down 71.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ghana data come from?
- The figures come from IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations, published as part of Comparative advantage in environmental goods (index). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV ¡ JSON â 18 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â Comparative advantage is a measure of the relative advantage or disadvantage a particular country has in a certain class of goods (in this case, environmental goods), and can be used to evaluate export potential in that class of goods. Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â A value greater than one indicates a relative advantage in environmental goods, while a value of less than one indicates a relative disadvantage.