Common Good Justifications Score in Poland
Poland: Common Good Justifications Score was 1.25 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Common Good Justifications Score in Poland, 1918–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, common good justifications score in Poland stood at 1.25.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 40.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, common good justifications score in Poland peaked at 1.7 in 1990 and was at its lowest, 0.381, in 1948.
Poland ranks 47th of 175 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Common Good Justifications Score in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1918 | 1.03 | — |
| 1919 | 1.03 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 1.03 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 1.03 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 1.03 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 1.03 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 1.03 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 1.03 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.427 | -58.4% |
| 1927 | 0.427 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.427 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.427 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.427 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.427 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.427 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.427 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.427 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.638 | +49.4% |
| 1936 | 0.638 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.638 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.638 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.577 | -9.6% |
| 1945 | 0.577 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.577 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.577 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.381 | -34.0% |
| 1949 | 0.381 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.381 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.381 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.381 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.381 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.381 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.381 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.949 | +149.1% |
| 1957 | 0.383 | -59.6% |
| 1958 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.58 | +51.4% |
| 1981 | 0.58 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.384 | -33.8% |
| 1983 | 0.384 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.384 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.384 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.384 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.384 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.384 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.943 | +145.6% |
| 1990 | 1.7 | +79.9% |
| 1991 | 1.7 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.7 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 1.7 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 1.7 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 1.7 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1.7 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 1.7 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1.7 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 1.7 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1.7 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 1.7 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 1.7 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1.7 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 1.7 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.82 | -51.7% |
| 2006 | 0.685 | -16.5% |
| 2007 | 0.641 | -6.4% |
| 2008 | 0.815 | +27.1% |
| 2009 | 0.815 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.815 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.815 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.911 | +11.8% |
| 2013 | 0.804 | -11.7% |
| 2014 | 0.845 | +5.1% |
| 2015 | 0.892 | +5.6% |
| 2016 | 0.966 | +8.3% |
| 2017 | 0.966 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1.05 | +8.6% |
| 2019 | 0.874 | -16.7% |
| 2020 | 0.966 | +10.5% |
| 2021 | 0.548 | -43.3% |
| 2022 | 0.548 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.603 | +10.0% |
| 2024 | 1.25 | +108.0% |
| 2025 | 1.25 | +0.0% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 1.25 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.23, 1.0× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Poland's 1.25 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.19, 1.1× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 1.03 | 1.03 | 1.03 | 2 |
| 1920s | 0.787 | 0.427 | 1.03 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.5208 | 0.427 | 0.638 | 9 |
| 1940s | 0.5117 | 0.381 | 0.577 | 6 |
| 1950s | 0.4384 | 0.381 | 0.949 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.383 | 0.383 | 0.383 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.383 | 0.383 | 0.383 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.4791 | 0.384 | 0.943 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.23 | 0.641 | 1.7 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.8937 | 0.804 | 1.05 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.8622 | 0.548 | 1.25 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More reference data data for Poland
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.499 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8896 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 9.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 8.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 43.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.84 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is common good justifications score in Poland?
- Common good justifications score in Poland was 1.25 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest common good justifications score recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 1.7 in 1990.
- What is the lowest common good justifications score recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.381 in 1948.
- How does Poland rank for common good justifications score?
- Poland ranks 47th out of 175 countries with data for 2025.
- Is common good justifications score rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 40.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 103 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.