Croatia vs Poland: Common Good Justifications Score
Croatia
1.27
in 2025
Poland
1.25
in 2025
Croatia rank
45th
Poland rank
47th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Croatia
- Poland
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 1.27 against 1.25 in Poland, a difference of 0.02.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 82 shared years of data; in 1944 it was Poland ahead.
Croatia ranks 45th and Poland ranks 47th of 175 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -2.04 | 0.5117 | 2.55 | Poland |
| 1950s | -1.6 | 0.4384 | 2.04 | Poland |
| 1960s | -1.21 | 0.383 | 1.59 | Poland |
| 1970s | -1.21 | 0.383 | 1.59 | Poland |
| 1980s | -1.21 | 0.4791 | 1.69 | Poland |
| 1990s | 0.1645 | 1.7 | 1.53 | Poland |
| 2000s | 1.16 | 1.23 | 0.0661 | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.9489 | 0.8937 | 0.0552 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.8582 | 0.8622 | 0.004 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Croatia or Poland?
- Croatia, at 1.27 against 1.25 in Poland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Croatia and Poland?
- 0.02, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Poland?
- 82 years are reported by both, from 1944 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Poland rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Croatia ranks 45th and Poland ranks 47th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.