Clientelism Index in Sweden
Sweden: Clientelism Index was 0.061 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Clientelism Index in Sweden, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, clientelism index in Sweden stood at 0.061.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 69.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, clientelism index in Sweden peaked at 0.352 in 1817 and was at its lowest, 0.029, in 1960.
Sweden ranks 164th of 176 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Clientelism Index in Sweden, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.331 | — |
| 1790 | 0.331 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.331 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.341 | +3.0% |
| 1793 | 0.341 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.341 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.341 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.341 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.341 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.341 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.341 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.339 | -0.6% |
| 1801 | 0.339 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.339 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.339 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.339 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.339 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.339 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.339 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.339 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.332 | -2.1% |
| 1810 | 0.332 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.332 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.339 | +2.1% |
| 1813 | 0.339 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.339 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.333 | -1.8% |
| 1816 | 0.333 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.352 | +5.7% |
| 1818 | 0.352 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.352 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.352 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.352 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.352 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.323 | -8.2% |
| 1824 | 0.323 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.323 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.323 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.323 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.334 | +3.4% |
| 1829 | 0.334 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.334 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.334 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.334 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.334 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.337 | +0.9% |
| 1835 | 0.337 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.337 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.337 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.337 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.337 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.333 | -1.2% |
| 1841 | 0.333 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.333 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.333 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.337 | +1.2% |
| 1845 | 0.337 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.337 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.333 | -1.2% |
| 1848 | 0.333 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.333 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.336 | +0.9% |
| 1851 | 0.336 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.336 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.32 | -4.8% |
| 1854 | 0.32 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.32 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.329 | +2.8% |
| 1857 | 0.329 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.329 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.325 | -1.2% |
| 1860 | 0.325 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.325 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.331 | +1.8% |
| 1863 | 0.331 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.331 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.331 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.331 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.105 | -68.3% |
| 1868 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.096 | -8.6% |
| 1870 | 0.096 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.096 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.103 | +7.3% |
| 1873 | 0.103 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.103 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.105 | +1.9% |
| 1876 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.107 | +1.9% |
| 1879 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.098 | -8.4% |
| 1882 | 0.098 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.098 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.112 | +14.3% |
| 1885 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.102 | -8.9% |
| 1888 | 0.101 | -1.0% |
| 1889 | 0.101 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.107 | +5.9% |
| 1891 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.107 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.108 | +0.9% |
| 1894 | 0.108 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.108 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.106 | -1.9% |
| 1897 | 0.106 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.106 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.102 | -3.8% |
| 1900 | 0.102 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.102 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.103 | +1.0% |
| 1903 | 0.105 | +1.9% |
| 1904 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.106 | +1.0% |
| 1906 | 0.106 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.106 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.113 | +6.6% |
| 1909 | 0.128 | +13.3% |
| 1910 | 0.128 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.125 | -2.3% |
| 1912 | 0.119 | -4.8% |
| 1913 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.114 | -4.2% |
| 1915 | 0.112 | -1.8% |
| 1916 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.095 | -15.2% |
| 1918 | 0.065 | -31.6% |
| 1919 | 0.065 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.063 | -3.1% |
| 1921 | 0.057 | -9.5% |
| 1922 | 0.054 | -5.3% |
| 1923 | 0.054 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.055 | +1.9% |
| 1925 | 0.057 | +3.6% |
| 1926 | 0.053 | -7.0% |
| 1927 | 0.053 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.054 | +1.9% |
| 1929 | 0.056 | +3.7% |
| 1930 | 0.048 | -14.3% |
| 1931 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.043 | -10.4% |
| 1934 | 0.043 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.043 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.043 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.044 | +2.3% |
| 1938 | 0.044 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.041 | -6.8% |
| 1940 | 0.04 | -2.4% |
| 1941 | 0.037 | -7.5% |
| 1942 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.042 | +13.5% |
| 1947 | 0.042 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.043 | +2.4% |
| 1949 | 0.045 | +4.7% |
| 1950 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.042 | -6.7% |
| 1953 | 0.044 | +4.8% |
| 1954 | 0.044 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.044 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.043 | -2.3% |
| 1957 | 0.041 | -4.7% |
| 1958 | 0.044 | +7.3% |
| 1959 | 0.046 | +4.5% |
| 1960 | 0.029 | -37.0% |
| 1961 | 0.03 | +3.4% |
| 1962 | 0.03 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.03 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.03 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.034 | +13.3% |
| 1966 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.033 | -2.9% |
| 1970 | 0.033 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.034 | +3.0% |
| 1972 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.035 | +2.9% |
| 1974 | 0.037 | +5.7% |
| 1975 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.036 | -2.7% |
| 1977 | 0.035 | -2.8% |
| 1978 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.034 | -2.9% |
| 1980 | 0.032 | -5.9% |
| 1981 | 0.032 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.032 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.033 | +3.1% |
| 1984 | 0.033 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.032 | -3.0% |
| 1986 | 0.031 | -3.1% |
| 1987 | 0.031 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.031 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.031 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.031 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.031 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.032 | +3.2% |
| 1993 | 0.032 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.034 | +6.3% |
| 1995 | 0.037 | +8.8% |
| 1996 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.036 | -2.7% |
| 1999 | 0.031 | -13.9% |
| 2000 | 0.031 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.031 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.031 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.031 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.031 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.031 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.031 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.029 | -6.5% |
| 2008 | 0.029 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.029 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.03 | +3.4% |
| 2011 | 0.031 | +3.3% |
| 2012 | 0.031 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.038 | +22.6% |
| 2014 | 0.038 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.036 | -5.3% |
| 2016 | 0.036 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.036 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.049 | +36.1% |
| 2019 | 0.05 | +2.0% |
| 2020 | 0.05 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.05 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.051 | +2.0% |
| 2023 | 0.061 | +19.6% |
| 2024 | 0.061 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.061 | +0.0% |
Sweden compared with similar countries
- Sweden's 0.061 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.131, 47% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Sweden's 0.061 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.182, 34% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.331 | 0.331 | 0.331 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.339 | 0.331 | 0.341 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.3383 | 0.332 | 0.339 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.3403 | 0.332 | 0.352 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.3339 | 0.323 | 0.352 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.3358 | 0.334 | 0.337 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.3342 | 0.333 | 0.337 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.328 | 0.32 | 0.336 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.2611 | 0.096 | 0.331 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.103 | 0.096 | 0.107 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.1041 | 0.098 | 0.112 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.1065 | 0.102 | 0.108 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.1076 | 0.102 | 0.128 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.1054 | 0.065 | 0.128 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.0556 | 0.053 | 0.063 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.0445 | 0.041 | 0.048 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.0397 | 0.037 | 0.045 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.0438 | 0.041 | 0.046 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.0318 | 0.029 | 0.034 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.035 | 0.033 | 0.037 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0318 | 0.031 | 0.033 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0338 | 0.031 | 0.037 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0304 | 0.029 | 0.031 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0375 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0557 | 0.05 | 0.061 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Sweden
More reference data data for Sweden
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4328 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2237 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2063 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9766 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.13 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.12 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is clientelism index in Sweden?
- Clientelism index in Sweden was 0.061 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest clientelism index recorded in Sweden?
- The highest recorded value was 0.352 in 1817.
- What is the lowest clientelism index recorded in Sweden?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.029 in 1960.
- How does Sweden rank for clientelism index?
- Sweden ranks 164th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is clientelism index rising or falling in Sweden?
- Over the last ten years it is up 69.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sweden data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Clientelism Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.