Clientelism index in Morocco
Morocco: Clientelism index was 0.565 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Latest (2025)
0.565
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
73rd
of 176 countries
All-time high
0.905
in 1789
All-time low
0.55
in 2020
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Clientelism index in Morocco, 1789–2025
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, clientelism index in Morocco stood at 0.565.
That represents a change of down 6.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, clientelism index in Morocco peaked at 0.905 in 1789 and was at its lowest, 0.55, in 2020.
That places Morocco 73rd out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Clientelism index in Morocco, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.905 | — |
| 1790 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.862 | -4.8% |
| 1920 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.809 | -6.1% |
| 1944 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.85 | +5.1% |
| 1957 | 0.829 | -2.5% |
| 1958 | 0.748 | -9.8% |
| 1959 | 0.798 | +6.7% |
| 1960 | 0.858 | +7.5% |
| 1961 | 0.857 | -0.1% |
| 1962 | 0.857 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.833 | -2.8% |
| 1964 | 0.818 | -1.8% |
| 1965 | 0.818 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.818 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.818 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.818 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.868 | +6.1% |
| 1970 | 0.874 | +0.7% |
| 1971 | 0.886 | +1.4% |
| 1972 | 0.886 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.886 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.886 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.886 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.886 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.905 | +2.1% |
| 1978 | 0.86 | -5.0% |
| 1979 | 0.86 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.86 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.86 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.86 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.86 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.845 | -1.7% |
| 1985 | 0.809 | -4.3% |
| 1986 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.809 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.842 | +4.1% |
| 1994 | 0.872 | +3.6% |
| 1995 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.862 | -1.1% |
| 1998 | 0.68 | -21.1% |
| 1999 | 0.68 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.649 | -4.6% |
| 2001 | 0.649 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.642 | -1.1% |
| 2003 | 0.552 | -14.0% |
| 2004 | 0.552 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.567 | +2.7% |
| 2006 | 0.567 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.568 | +0.2% |
| 2008 | 0.568 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.568 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.568 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.582 | +2.5% |
| 2012 | 0.576 | -1.0% |
| 2013 | 0.586 | +1.7% |
| 2014 | 0.586 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.605 | +3.2% |
| 2016 | 0.591 | -2.3% |
| 2017 | 0.588 | -0.5% |
| 2018 | 0.588 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.588 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.55 | -6.5% |
| 2021 | 0.555 | +0.9% |
| 2022 | 0.565 | +1.8% |
| 2023 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
Morocco compared with similar countries
- Morocco's 0.565 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.6325, 89% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Morocco's 0.565 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0.572, 99% of the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.9007 | 0.862 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.862 | 0.862 | 0.862 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.862 | 0.862 | 0.862 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.8249 | 0.809 | 0.862 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.8079 | 0.748 | 0.85 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.8363 | 0.818 | 0.868 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.8815 | 0.86 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.833 | 0.809 | 0.86 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.8107 | 0.68 | 0.872 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.5882 | 0.552 | 0.649 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.5858 | 0.568 | 0.605 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.5608 | 0.55 | 0.565 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Morocco
- 70 Sao Tome and Principe 0.573 compare
- 71 Bahrain 0.572 compare
- 72 Saudi Arabia 0.568 compare
- 73 Kazakhstan 0.565 compare
- 75 Mali 0.559 compare
- 76 Montenegro 0.548 compare
More reference data data for Morocco
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4441 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 8.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4159 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 21.09 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 38.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.42 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is clientelism index in Morocco?
- Clientelism index in Morocco was 0.565 in 2025, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest clientelism index recorded in Morocco?
- The highest recorded value was 0.905 in 1789.
- What is the lowest clientelism index recorded in Morocco?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.55 in 2020.
- How does Morocco rank for clientelism index?
- Morocco ranks 73rd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is clientelism index rising or falling in Morocco?
- Over the last ten years it is down 6.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Morocco data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Clientelism index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).