Clientelism Index in Italy
Italy: Clientelism Index was 0.218 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Clientelism Index in Italy, 1861–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, clientelism index in Italy stood at 0.218.
The figure is up 16.6% on the previous year and up 19.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, clientelism index in Italy peaked at 0.762 in 1861 and was at its lowest, 0.144, in 2022.
Italy ranks 138th of 176 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 165 years of available data.
Clientelism Index in Italy, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1861 | 0.762 | — |
| 1862 | 0.538 | -29.4% |
| 1863 | 0.538 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.538 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.538 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.536 | -0.4% |
| 1867 | 0.531 | -0.9% |
| 1868 | 0.53 | -0.2% |
| 1869 | 0.53 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.585 | +10.4% |
| 1871 | 0.645 | +10.3% |
| 1872 | 0.645 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.645 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.646 | +0.2% |
| 1875 | 0.65 | +0.6% |
| 1876 | 0.648 | -0.3% |
| 1877 | 0.638 | -1.5% |
| 1878 | 0.638 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.638 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.654 | +2.5% |
| 1881 | 0.664 | +1.5% |
| 1882 | 0.659 | -0.8% |
| 1883 | 0.643 | -2.4% |
| 1884 | 0.643 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.643 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.646 | +0.5% |
| 1887 | 0.648 | +0.3% |
| 1888 | 0.648 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.648 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.646 | -0.3% |
| 1891 | 0.629 | -2.6% |
| 1892 | 0.632 | +0.5% |
| 1893 | 0.651 | +3.0% |
| 1894 | 0.651 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.625 | -4.0% |
| 1896 | 0.623 | -0.3% |
| 1897 | 0.64 | +2.7% |
| 1898 | 0.644 | +0.6% |
| 1899 | 0.644 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.576 | -10.6% |
| 1901 | 0.565 | -1.9% |
| 1902 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.565 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.562 | -0.5% |
| 1905 | 0.546 | -2.8% |
| 1906 | 0.546 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.546 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.546 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.556 | +1.8% |
| 1910 | 0.558 | +0.4% |
| 1911 | 0.558 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.543 | -2.7% |
| 1913 | 0.541 | -0.4% |
| 1914 | 0.554 | +2.4% |
| 1915 | 0.541 | -2.3% |
| 1916 | 0.541 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.541 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.541 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.542 | +0.2% |
| 1920 | 0.517 | -4.6% |
| 1921 | 0.534 | +3.3% |
| 1922 | 0.581 | +8.8% |
| 1923 | 0.741 | +27.5% |
| 1924 | 0.7 | -5.5% |
| 1925 | 0.686 | -2.0% |
| 1926 | 0.687 | +0.1% |
| 1927 | 0.687 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.687 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.69 | +0.4% |
| 1930 | 0.691 | +0.1% |
| 1931 | 0.691 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.691 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.691 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.696 | +0.7% |
| 1935 | 0.697 | +0.1% |
| 1936 | 0.697 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.697 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.697 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.697 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.697 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.697 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.697 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.697 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.51 | -26.8% |
| 1945 | 0.51 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.52 | +2.0% |
| 1947 | 0.374 | -28.1% |
| 1948 | 0.386 | +3.2% |
| 1949 | 0.394 | +2.1% |
| 1950 | 0.394 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.394 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.394 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.34 | -13.7% |
| 1954 | 0.335 | -1.5% |
| 1955 | 0.335 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.335 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.335 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.336 | +0.3% |
| 1959 | 0.336 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.333 | -0.9% |
| 1961 | 0.333 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.333 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.321 | -3.6% |
| 1964 | 0.315 | -1.9% |
| 1965 | 0.315 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.315 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.315 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.329 | +4.4% |
| 1969 | 0.338 | +2.7% |
| 1970 | 0.3 | -11.2% |
| 1971 | 0.3 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.28 | -6.7% |
| 1973 | 0.269 | -3.9% |
| 1974 | 0.269 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.269 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.269 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.268 | -0.4% |
| 1978 | 0.268 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.279 | +4.1% |
| 1980 | 0.286 | +2.5% |
| 1981 | 0.286 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.286 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.281 | -1.7% |
| 1984 | 0.275 | -2.1% |
| 1985 | 0.268 | -2.5% |
| 1986 | 0.268 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.271 | +1.1% |
| 1988 | 0.274 | +1.1% |
| 1989 | 0.274 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.217 | -20.8% |
| 1991 | 0.217 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.215 | -0.9% |
| 1993 | 0.21 | -2.3% |
| 1994 | 0.213 | +1.4% |
| 1995 | 0.211 | -0.9% |
| 1996 | 0.218 | +3.3% |
| 1997 | 0.214 | -1.8% |
| 1998 | 0.214 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.214 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.214 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.214 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.208 | -2.8% |
| 2003 | 0.208 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.208 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.208 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.19 | -8.7% |
| 2007 | 0.184 | -3.2% |
| 2008 | 0.171 | -7.1% |
| 2009 | 0.166 | -2.9% |
| 2010 | 0.166 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.181 | +9.0% |
| 2012 | 0.189 | +4.4% |
| 2013 | 0.184 | -2.6% |
| 2014 | 0.183 | -0.5% |
| 2015 | 0.183 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.183 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.183 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.153 | -16.4% |
| 2019 | 0.166 | +8.5% |
| 2020 | 0.149 | -10.2% |
| 2021 | 0.145 | -2.7% |
| 2022 | 0.144 | -0.7% |
| 2023 | 0.187 | +29.9% |
| 2024 | 0.187 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.218 | +16.6% |
Italy compared with similar countries
- Italy's 0.218 is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.131, 1.7× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Italy's 0.218 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.182, 1.2× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Clientelism Index in Italy changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | +29.9% | 0.144 | 0.187 |
| 1862 | -29.4% | 0.762 | 0.538 |
| 1947 | -28.1% | 0.52 | 0.374 |
| 1923 | +27.5% | 0.581 | 0.741 |
| 1944 | -26.8% | 0.697 | 0.51 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0.5601 | 0.53 | 0.762 | 9 |
| 1870s | 0.6378 | 0.585 | 0.65 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.6496 | 0.643 | 0.664 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.6385 | 0.623 | 0.651 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.5573 | 0.546 | 0.576 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.546 | 0.541 | 0.558 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.651 | 0.517 | 0.741 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.6945 | 0.691 | 0.697 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.5482 | 0.374 | 0.697 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.3534 | 0.335 | 0.394 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.3247 | 0.315 | 0.338 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.2771 | 0.268 | 0.3 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.2769 | 0.268 | 0.286 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.2143 | 0.21 | 0.218 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1971 | 0.166 | 0.214 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1771 | 0.153 | 0.189 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1717 | 0.144 | 0.218 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Italy
More reference data data for Italy
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.927 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 8.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 8.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.21 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 6.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 41.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 5.05 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is clientelism index in Italy?
- Clientelism index in Italy was 0.218 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest clientelism index recorded in Italy?
- The highest recorded value was 0.762 in 1861.
- What is the lowest clientelism index recorded in Italy?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.144 in 2022.
- How does Italy rank for clientelism index?
- Italy ranks 138th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is clientelism index rising or falling in Italy?
- Over the last ten years it is up 19.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Italy data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Clientelism Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 165 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.