Clientelism Index in Afghanistan
Afghanistan: Clientelism Index was 0.948 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Clientelism Index in Afghanistan, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Afghanistan recorded 0.948 for clientelism index in 2025. That is the highest value across all 237 years on record.
That represents a change of up 8.5% on the previous year and up 44.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, clientelism index in Afghanistan peaked at 0.948 in 2025 and was at its lowest, 0.405, in 2001.
Afghanistan ranks 1st of 176 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Clientelism Index in Afghanistan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.817 | — |
| 1790 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.817 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.525 | -35.7% |
| 1921 | 0.525 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.525 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.525 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.525 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.525 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.525 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.525 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.525 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.525 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.569 | +8.4% |
| 1931 | 0.618 | +8.6% |
| 1932 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.618 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.596 | -3.6% |
| 1935 | 0.596 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.596 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.587 | -1.5% |
| 1938 | 0.587 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.587 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.606 | +3.2% |
| 1941 | 0.606 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.606 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.616 | +1.7% |
| 1944 | 0.616 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.616 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.608 | -1.3% |
| 1947 | 0.608 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.608 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.566 | -6.9% |
| 1950 | 0.552 | -2.5% |
| 1951 | 0.552 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.606 | +9.8% |
| 1953 | 0.611 | +0.8% |
| 1954 | 0.611 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.611 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.611 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.611 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.592 | -3.1% |
| 1959 | 0.592 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.592 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.601 | +1.5% |
| 1962 | 0.604 | +0.5% |
| 1963 | 0.584 | -3.3% |
| 1964 | 0.584 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.56 | -4.1% |
| 1966 | 0.505 | -9.8% |
| 1967 | 0.505 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.505 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.511 | +1.2% |
| 1970 | 0.521 | +2.0% |
| 1971 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.521 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.526 | +1.0% |
| 1974 | 0.526 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.526 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.526 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.526 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.585 | +11.2% |
| 1979 | 0.664 | +13.5% |
| 1980 | 0.664 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.664 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.664 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.664 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.664 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.664 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.664 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.664 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.686 | +3.3% |
| 1989 | 0.693 | +1.0% |
| 1990 | 0.747 | +7.8% |
| 1991 | 0.747 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.811 | +8.6% |
| 1993 | 0.811 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.811 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.811 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.811 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.832 | +2.6% |
| 1998 | 0.832 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.832 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.832 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.405 | -51.3% |
| 2002 | 0.422 | +4.2% |
| 2003 | 0.422 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.452 | +7.1% |
| 2005 | 0.566 | +25.2% |
| 2006 | 0.566 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.566 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.566 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.586 | +3.5% |
| 2010 | 0.631 | +7.7% |
| 2011 | 0.655 | +3.8% |
| 2012 | 0.654 | -0.2% |
| 2013 | 0.682 | +4.3% |
| 2014 | 0.666 | -2.3% |
| 2015 | 0.658 | -1.2% |
| 2016 | 0.631 | -4.1% |
| 2017 | 0.66 | +4.6% |
| 2018 | 0.667 | +1.1% |
| 2019 | 0.694 | +4.0% |
| 2020 | 0.668 | -3.7% |
| 2021 | 0.896 | +34.1% |
| 2022 | 0.928 | +3.6% |
| 2023 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.874 | -5.8% |
| 2025 | 0.948 | +8.5% |
Afghanistan compared with similar countries
- Afghanistan's 0.948 is above the median for low income countries, which is 0.692, 1.4× the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Afghanistan's 0.948 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0.572, 1.7× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.817 | 0.817 | 0.817 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.817 | 0.817 | 0.817 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.817 | 0.817 | 0.817 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.817 | 0.817 | 0.817 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.817 | 0.817 | 0.817 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.817 | 0.817 | 0.817 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.817 | 0.817 | 0.817 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.817 | 0.817 | 0.817 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.817 | 0.817 | 0.817 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.817 | 0.817 | 0.817 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.817 | 0.817 | 0.817 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.817 | 0.817 | 0.817 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.817 | 0.817 | 0.817 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.817 | 0.817 | 0.817 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.525 | 0.525 | 0.525 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.5972 | 0.569 | 0.618 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.6056 | 0.566 | 0.616 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.5949 | 0.552 | 0.611 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.5551 | 0.505 | 0.604 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.5442 | 0.521 | 0.664 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.6691 | 0.664 | 0.693 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.8045 | 0.747 | 0.832 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.5383 | 0.405 | 0.832 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.6598 | 0.631 | 0.694 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.8737 | 0.668 | 0.948 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Afghanistan
More reference data data for Afghanistan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8991 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4362 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 6.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.847 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 18.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 26.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.38 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is clientelism index in Afghanistan?
- Clientelism index in Afghanistan was 0.948 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest clientelism index recorded in Afghanistan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.948 in 2025.
- What is the lowest clientelism index recorded in Afghanistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.405 in 2001.
- How does Afghanistan rank for clientelism index?
- Afghanistan ranks 1st out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is clientelism index rising or falling in Afghanistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 44.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Afghanistan data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Clientelism Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.