Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban was 9.9% in 2021. ▼ Falling

Latest (2021)
9.9%
Change on year
down 6.9%
World rank
14th
of 34 countries
All-time high
17.9%
in 2007
All-time low
9.7%
in 2019
Years of data
9
2007–2021

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Kazakhstan, 2007–2021

051015202007201420212007: 17.92010: 142014: 13.32015: 10.72017: 10.92018: 10.42019: 9.72020: 10.72021: 9.9

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Kazakhstan recorded 9.9% for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban in 2021.

The figure is down 6.9% on the previous year and down 29.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban in Kazakhstan peaked at 17.9% in 2007 and was at its lowest, 9.7%, in 2019.

That places Kazakhstan 14th out of 34 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Kazakhstan, year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Kazakhstan, 2007 to 2021.
Year Value Change
2007 17.9%
2010 14.0% -21.8%
2014 13.3% -5.2%
2015 10.7% -19.8%
2017 10.9% +2.0%
2018 10.4% -4.3%
2019 9.7% -6.6%
2020 10.7% +9.6%
2021 9.9% -6.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 17.9% 17.9% 17.9% 1
2010s 11.5% 9.7% 14.0% 6
2020s 10.3% 9.9% 10.7% 2

Countries ranked near Kazakhstan

  1. 11 Chile 13.7% compare
  2. 12 Mongolia 11.6% compare
  3. 13 Türkiye 10.4% compare
  4. 15 Viet Nam 9.2% compare
  5. 16 Côte d'Ivoire 8.1% compare
  6. 17 Sri Lanka 8.0% compare

See the full ranking of 34 places →

More reference data data for Kazakhstan

All data for Kazakhstan →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban in Kazakhstan?
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban in Kazakhstan was 9.9% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban recorded in Kazakhstan?
The highest recorded value was 17.9% in 2007.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban recorded in Kazakhstan?
The lowest recorded value was 9.7% in 2019.
How does Kazakhstan rank for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
Kazakhstan ranks 14th out of 34 countries with data for 2021.
Is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
Over the last ten years it is down 29.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Kazakhstan. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-urban/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-urban/kazakhstan/">Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Kazakhstan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 347 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population