Kazakhstan vs Mongolia: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Kazakhstan
9.9%
in 2021
Mongolia
11.6%
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
14th
Mongolia rank
12th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Kazakhstan
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 11.6% against 9.9% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 12th of 34 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.9% | 18.1% | 0.2% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 12.6% | 16.7% | 4.1% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 10.7% | 11.6% | 1.0% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Kazakhstan or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 11.6% against 9.9% in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Kazakhstan and Mongolia?
- 1.7%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mongolia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Mongolia rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Kazakhstan ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 12th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population